Integration of satellite remote sensing data in ecosystem modelling at local scales: Practices and trends

Abstract

Spatiotemporal ecological modelling of terrestrial ecosystems relies on climatological and biophysical Earth observations. Due to their increasing availability, global coverage, frequent acquisition and high spatial resolution, satellite remote sensing (SRS) products are frequently integrated to in situ data in the development of ecosystem models (EMs) quantifying the interaction among the vegetation component and the hydrological, energy and nutrient cycles. This review highlights the main advances achieved in the last decade in combining SRS data with EMs, with particular attention to the challenges modellers face for applications at local scales (e.g. small watersheds). We critically review the literature on progress made towards integration of SRS data into terrestrial EMs: (1) as input to define model drivers; (2) as reference to validate model results; and (3) as a tool to sequentially update the state variables, and to quantify and reduce model uncertainty. The number of applications provided in the literature shows that EMs may profit greatly from the inclusion of spatial parameters and forcings provided by vegetation and climatic‐related SRS products. Limiting factors for the application of such models to local scales are: (1) mismatch between the resolution of SRS products and model grid; (2) unavailability of specific products in free and public online repositories; (3) temporal gaps in SRS data; and (4) quantification of model and measurement uncertainties. This review provides examples of possible solutions adopted in recent literature, with particular reference to the spatiotemporal scales of analysis and data accuracy. We propose that analysis methods such as stochastic downscaling techniques and multi‐sensor/multi‐platform fusion approaches are necessary to improve the quality of SRS data for local applications. Moreover, we suggest coupling models with data assimilation techniques to improve their forecast abilities. This review encourages the use of SRS data in EMs for local applications, and underlines the necessity for a closer collaboration among EM developers and remote sensing scientists. With more upcoming satellite missions, especially the Sentinel platforms, concerted efforts to further integrate SRS into modelling are in great demand and these types of applications will certainly proliferate.

Improving the Predictive Skill of a Distributed Hydrological Model by Calibration on Spatial Patterns With Multiple Satellite Data Sets

“…For a few decades, satellite remote sensing (SRS) has opened up new avenues for the development of spatial hydrology (Cui et al, 2018;Engman & Gurney, 1991;Lettenmaier et al, 2015;McCabe et al, 2017;Mendoza et al, 2002;Pasetto et al, 2018;Schmugge et al, 2002). The increasing and unprecedented availability of SRS data at increasingly finer spatial and temporal resolutions has triggered the development of large-domain water management applications including flood and drought monitoring (Hapuarachchi et al, 2011;Klemas, 2014;Revilla-Romero et al, 2015;Senay et al, 2015;Sheffield et al, 2012;Su et al, 2017;Teng et al, 2017;Wu et al, 2014).…”

Increasing Dairy Sustainability with Integrated Crop–Livestock Farming

“…Farm vegetation productivity is often derived from extensive field campaigns or, in more recent cases, using eddy covariance measurements [65], which may impose challenges due to time or funding constraints. Remote sensing techniques can significantly simplify this process at low cost [66]. Following objective one, we show that NPP estimated from remote sensing techniques gave exceptional correlations with farm harvest data for individual crop fields.…”

Spatial patterns and temporal variability of seagrass connectivity in the Mediterranean Sea

“…Although most of these studies refer to relatively small areas within the Mediterranean Sea, the most recent one (Traganos et al, ) proposes a workflow for regional‐scale mapping of seagrasses powered by remote sensing, machine learning and cloud‐based technologies that could be potentially scaled up to even larger (possibly global) spatial scales. Indeed, Earth observations (both remote and in situ), species distribution modelling (Elith & Leathwick, ; see Chefaoui, Duarte, & Serrão, ; Chefaoui et al, for recent applications of niche modelling to P. oceanica ) and ecological modelling should be considered complementary pillars for the elaboration of future large‐scale conservation programmes (Pasetto et al, ).…”