Integration of green supply chain management practices in construction supply chain of CPEC

Ali, Yousaf; Saad, Talal Bin; Sabir, Muhammad; Muhammad, Noor Azimah; Salman, Ali; Zeb, Khaqan

doi:10.1108/meq-12-2018-0211

Cited by 61 publications

(40 citation statements)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The literature is divided into the following four main interrelated parts (as depicted by the author in Figure 1): The integration between the two research fields of green production and operations management (GPOM) (Afum et al, 2020; Baines et al, 2012; Digalwar et al, 2013; Heidrich & Tiwary, 2013) and SCM resulted in GSCM studies. Various researchers (Abdullah, 2016; Agyabeng-Mensah et al, 2020; Ali et al, 2020; Bag et al, 2020; Ding & Wang, 2020; Lou et al, 2020; Taleizadeh et al, 2020) studied GSCM strategy and its cross-functional practices. The interaction between GPOM and entrepreneurship research areas generated the green entrepreneurship (GE) research interest. Some studies (Braun, 2010; Demirel et al, 2019; Gibbs & O’Neill, 2012; Haldar, 2019; Lin & Chen, 2018; Schaper, 2016) discussed the importance of having green entrepreneurs or eco-entrepreneurs, in which the performance of their individual companies can be characterised by being proactive, innovative, risk-taker and environment-friendly.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The integration between the two research fields of green production and operations management (GPOM) (Afum et al, 2020; Baines et al, 2012; Digalwar et al, 2013; Heidrich & Tiwary, 2013) and SCM resulted in GSCM studies. Various researchers (Abdullah, 2016; Agyabeng-Mensah et al, 2020; Ali et al, 2020; Bag et al, 2020; Ding & Wang, 2020; Lou et al, 2020; Taleizadeh et al, 2020) studied GSCM strategy and its cross-functional practices.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Mapping and Assessing Green Entrepreneurial Performance: Evidence from a Vertically Integrated Organic Beverages Supply Chain

Adel

2021

Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economie

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this article is to use strategy mapping (SM) and balanced scorecard (BSC) in portraying and assessing green entrepreneurial supply chain management (GESCM) performance of a vertically integrated entrepreneurial supply chain in an Egyptian emerging market of organic beverages industry. Based on thematic literature review and qualitative research (in-depth interviews with experts, focus groups, observations, and reports’ analysis), multi-item measurement quantitative BSC scale and strategy map were proposed to measure and communicate the GESCM performance of a hierarchical chain with multiple nodes and cross-functional green practices. This article conceptually contributes to the active debate on contemporary GESCM performance measurement. It integrates the literature of green production and operations management, strategic management and entrepreneurial supply chain management (ESCM) to investigate the unexplored context of GESCM research. It empirically assesses GESCM performance of an attractive network using BSC and maps its strategy with its multidisciplinary environment-friendly practices. The GESCM performance was measured in terms of four integrated perspectives (innovative and proactive processes, learning and growth, financial gains and supply chain stakeholders’ delight). Results showed that BSC and SM are effective and efficient tools in managing the performance of a successful GESC in an emerging market. Royal Herbs’ BSC key performance indicators (KPIs), which were used in assessing a GESCM strategy, indicate improvements along the BSC’s four perspectives. Results give green entrepreneurs/manufacturers in an emerging market as Egypt a comprehensive view on how they can effectively assess/improve their GESCM performance. It draws attention to the importance of investing in GESCM practices for maintaining sustainable development in a clean business environment. It helps practitioners, academics and policymakers in Egypt to bridge the gap between theory and practice regarding GESCM performance. From an interdisciplinary perspective, it provides insights on improving the ESCM performance of the industry without harming its natural environment.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mapping and Assessing Green Entrepreneurial Performance: Evidence from a Vertically Integrated Organic Beverages Supply Chain

Adel

2021

Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economie

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…GSCM is not only considered an enabler of environmental enhancement, but it also improves the economic performance of an organization (Y. Ali et al, 2020;Rao & Holt, 2005;Tumpa et al, 2019;Yang et al, 2020). According to A.…”

Section: Green Supply Chain Management (Gscm)mentioning

confidence: 99%

An AHP Framework to Evaluate Barriers and Potential Tensions to Green Supply Chain Management in the Food and Beverage Industry

2021

EJBM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With an increasing awareness of climate change and the need for sustainable processes, a growing number of studies have addressed green supply chain management (GSCM), its drivers, barriers, and implementation frameworks. However, despite the importance of environmental practices, industries are reluctant to implement GSCM activities, as many obstacles can arise while initiating GSCM in traditional supply chain management (TSCM). The previous literature review indicated substantial research on the barriers that hinder the adoption of green activities. To the best of our knowledge, no previous research has assessed the tensions and conflicts that may arise among collaborating actors, which can also hinder the adoption of environmental business practices. In particular, there is a notable gap in research that investigates the green-supply-chain issues in the Egyptian food and beverage manufacturing sector. In this paper, we went a step ahead to investigate these issues and to explore how GSCM barriers cause tensions among collaborating actors. Hence, the purpose of this paper is to investigate the barriers and tensions that impede the implementation of GSCM in the Egyptian food and beverage industry (FBI). In our methodology, we targeted three large food and beverage multinational companies located in Egypt. Barriers and types of tensions were identified through the literature review. Data collection consisted of three phases. For the primary source of data, a qualitative method was utilized for semi-structured interviews, followed by a questionnaire survey. Furthermore, a decision group was formed to collect and validate the data. Using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), this study categorised the identified barriers based on the relevant type of tension and explored how such barriers can create tension among various stakeholders. Thirty-nine barriers and 11 types of tension were identified through the literature review and discussion with experts. Of the total number of identified barriers, 18 were identified as common. Based on the AHP results, the category of economic tensions had the most importance. The barrier related to inflation and the currency exchange rate was the most significant among the 18 barriers and was the main driver of economic tensions. Our findings suggest that the economic instability of countries can affect the implementation of GSCM. This is the first study that combines barriers and tensions among stakeholders as impediments toward adopting green environmental practices. This study provides a new approach to the literature, giving insight into the tensions that could delay or prevent the adoption of green business activities, an approach that could be a scientific breakthrough for upcoming studies. Finally, this study can help the Egyptian FBI to identify the main issues that could hinder the transition from TSCM to GSCM.

show abstract

“…CPEC is another name of international opportunity for business organizations operating in China and Pakistan. It is aimed to promote free trade between Pakistan and China to help improve economic growth and gross domestic product (GDP) (Ali, Saad, et al, 2020; Ali, Sabir, et al, 2020). It is also considered as the best trade zone of China–Pakistan and a hub of international business promotion.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Top managers' attributes, innovation, and the participation in China–Pakistan Economic Corridor: A study of energy sector small and medium‐sized enterprises

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A large number of researchers are engaged in studying the determinants and consequences of China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). Although optimism abounds, in particular, few empirical evidence is available for Pakistani businessmen and small and medium‐sized enterprise (SME) operators on how to benefit from this tremendous opportunity. Our study examined how top managers/owners of Pakistani energy sector SMEs can innovate their businesses to reap the benefits of CPEC. We have examined the influence of demographic factors (age, education, experience, and financial literacy) of top managers/owners on different forms of innovation (product, process, marketing, and organization) and their consequent chances of success through participation in CPEC.

show abstract

Integration of green supply chain management practices in construction supply chain of CPEC

Cited by 61 publications

References 43 publications

Mapping and Assessing Green Entrepreneurial Performance: Evidence from a Vertically Integrated Organic Beverages Supply Chain

Mapping and Assessing Green Entrepreneurial Performance: Evidence from a Vertically Integrated Organic Beverages Supply Chain

An AHP Framework to Evaluate Barriers and Potential Tensions to Green Supply Chain Management in the Food and Beverage Industry

Top managers' attributes, innovation, and the participation in China–Pakistan Economic Corridor: A study of energy sector small and medium‐sized enterprises

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About