2020 Third International Conference on Vocational Education and Electrical Engineering (ICVEE) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icvee50212.2020.9243260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of FAHP and COPRAS Method for New Student Admission Decision Making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantage of FAHP is the use of index consistency to control the error rate of the decision [5] [6]. The TOPSIS method is capable of making multi-criteria decisions based on the concept that the chosen alternative will be ranked for the MSME industry mapping process [7][8] [9].…”
Section: Intoductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The advantage of FAHP is the use of index consistency to control the error rate of the decision [5] [6]. The TOPSIS method is capable of making multi-criteria decisions based on the concept that the chosen alternative will be ranked for the MSME industry mapping process [7][8] [9].…”
Section: Intoductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, triangular fuzzy number TFN scale was used. The process of transforming fuzzy logic to AHP in this study was carried out by following method developed by Gungor [5]. Triangular Fuzzy Number (TFN) operation, defined three real numbers as low, middle, upper.…”
Section: 1fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fahp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particular advantage of COPRAS is the accuracy of the provided rankings of alternatives due to the separate evaluation of profit and cost criteria [ 24 ]. Thus, the final COPRAS score is derived from the positive ideal solution and the negative ideal solution, and the best alternative should have the highest value for the positive ideal solution and the lowest value for the negative ideal solution [ 25 , 26 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Zavadskas, et al in [4] the COPRAS method is a Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method that is used to evaluate alternatives where the ratio based on two measures, the sum of the performance of the favorable criteria and the sum of the unfavorable criteria. The COPRAS method is used for the assessment of ICT development in G7 countries [5], vulnerability mapping of subwatershed erosion [6], green logistics and green supply chain management [7], Decision Making for New Student Admissions at MTsN Bangkalan [8], motorcycle selection Electricity [9], multi-criteria decision making for hybrid wind power plants [10], Supplier Selection at ABC Mining Companies in Indonesia [11], and Determination of Potential Zones for the Pasir Batu Mine [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%