2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2017.8296938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of discriminative features and similarity-preserving encoding for finger vein image retrieval

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, Fei et al utilized Euclidean and Hamming distance to evaluate the similarities of feature vector, respectively. In addition, Wang et al [26] divided a finger-vein image into 96 patches and each patch encoded as a 19-dimensional decimal vector, then the whole 1824-dimensional decimal feature was compacted and encoded as a 128-dimensional binary feature. Based on the one-to-many matching scheme above, we calculate the false acceptance rate (FAR) and the false rejection rate (FRR), and by adjusting the recognition threshold we draw the ROC curves of various approaches, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: ) Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, Fei et al utilized Euclidean and Hamming distance to evaluate the similarities of feature vector, respectively. In addition, Wang et al [26] divided a finger-vein image into 96 patches and each patch encoded as a 19-dimensional decimal vector, then the whole 1824-dimensional decimal feature was compacted and encoded as a 128-dimensional binary feature. Based on the one-to-many matching scheme above, we calculate the false acceptance rate (FAR) and the false rejection rate (FRR), and by adjusting the recognition threshold we draw the ROC curves of various approaches, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: ) Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local binary pattern (LBP) [20], local line binary pattern (LLBP) [21] and pyramid histogram of double competitive pattern (PHDCP) [22] encoded the vein pattern using local statistical information. Relying on the bifurcation and termination of veins, various methods [23]- [26] were proposed to extract such key points with different feature descriptor. Furthermore, the scale invariant feature transform (SIFT) [27], [28] was employed to acquire minute features that are more robust to rotation and translation.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To learn a feature mapping relationship to enhance the recognition ability of local features, a discriminative binary descriptor (DBD) [27] method is proposed. Recently, there are some classical methods of encoding and extracting features, such as k-means hashing-based method (KMHM) [28], iterative quantization-based method (ITQM) [29], weighted vein code indexing [30], anatomy structure analysis-based vein extraction (ASVAE) [31].…”
Section: Related Work a Finger Vein Recognition Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This proves that our method can update the parameters of Gabor function better and extract the main vein information of finger vein image. And our method has the best performance compared with other latest methods and other classical methods, such as k-means hashingbased method (KMHM) [28], iterative quantization-based method (ITQM) [29], Deep representation-based feature extraction [36], Repeated line tracking, Maximum curvature, LLBP, ELBP. However, compared with Combining primary and soft biometric traits [57], Weighted Vein code indexing [30], our method performs worse on SDUMAL and FV-USM datasets.…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-the-art Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 96%