2011
DOI: 10.1080/00207541003794876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of closed loop distribution supply chain network and 3PRLP selection for the case of battery recycling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Aguezzoul [7], the main MCDM methods used in the case of 3PL provider selection are: analytic hierarchy process (AHP) [14,[38][39][40][41], analytic network process (ANP) [9,11,34,42,43], technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) [10,39,44], interpretive structural model (ISM) [42,44,45], multi-criteria optimization and compromise solution (VIKOR) [43,46], decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) [34,43], quality function deployment (QFD) [35,37], elimination and choice expressing reality (ELECTRE) [47], and utility theory [47]. Also, two different MCDM methods were applied together or a fuzzy sets theory (FST) is used with one of the MCDM methods as an integrated solution [10,13,14,37,39,40,44,46,48,49]. In terms of the number of publication from 1994 to 2013, AHP, ANP, and TOPSIS were chosen as the top three MCDM methods for the 3PL provider evaluation and selection [7].…”
Section: Evaluation Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Aguezzoul [7], the main MCDM methods used in the case of 3PL provider selection are: analytic hierarchy process (AHP) [14,[38][39][40][41], analytic network process (ANP) [9,11,34,42,43], technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) [10,39,44], interpretive structural model (ISM) [42,44,45], multi-criteria optimization and compromise solution (VIKOR) [43,46], decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) [34,43], quality function deployment (QFD) [35,37], elimination and choice expressing reality (ELECTRE) [47], and utility theory [47]. Also, two different MCDM methods were applied together or a fuzzy sets theory (FST) is used with one of the MCDM methods as an integrated solution [10,13,14,37,39,40,44,46,48,49]. In terms of the number of publication from 1994 to 2013, AHP, ANP, and TOPSIS were chosen as the top three MCDM methods for the 3PL provider evaluation and selection [7].…”
Section: Evaluation Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective of this study is to evaluate the optimal capacities of the decision variables including manufacturing stock, purchasing warehouse and the vehicle, and the optimal value of returned used end-of-life products. In addition, several studies designed the CLSC of battery manufacturers and analyzed economic performance and the optimal use and waste of recycled products [33,34].…”
Section: Closed-loop Supply Chain (Clsc) Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result showed that the carbon tax mechanism can effectively increase the volume of collection and benefit for all supply chain members. Sasikumar and Haq investigated the CLSC for the case of battery recycling in automobile industry and found the cost deduction can be achieved through CLSC [32]. Georgiadis took paper industry as an example, and put forward a dynamic model of capacity planning based on recycling strategy [33].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%