2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10113-021-01774-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating traditional ecological knowledge into academic research at local and global scales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The gap between the PA managers' perception and professional monitoring results comes from missing reference situations for the species and habitats, making any inter-temporal and inter-spatial comparison complicated. Therefore, we need rigid accuracy testing rules and solid reference baselines for the data inputs from 'citizen science' since any misjudgment about species, or habitat change can lead to inadequate management response [47][48][49][50][51][52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gap between the PA managers' perception and professional monitoring results comes from missing reference situations for the species and habitats, making any inter-temporal and inter-spatial comparison complicated. Therefore, we need rigid accuracy testing rules and solid reference baselines for the data inputs from 'citizen science' since any misjudgment about species, or habitat change can lead to inadequate management response [47][48][49][50][51][52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, disregarding that local populations depend on biodiversity for a living could hamper our ability to produce socially inclusive theories. In fact, recently the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services has argued that the traditional ecological knowledge is a missing component in applied sciences and in the decision-making process (see also IPBES, 2018;Jack et al, 2020;Albuquerque et al, 2021). This has raised two pertinent issues for promoting a program that incorporates local knowledge into biodiversity disciplines: (1) How can the fields of ethnobiology and biodiversity be integrated to better understand how landscapes, animals, and plants have been used and domesticated?…”
Section: Editorial On the Research Topic Integrating Traditional Ecol...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has prompted the use of alternative and less invasive methods, such as Local Ecological Knowledge (LEK) in elephant ecology (Biru and Bekele, 2012;Buchholtz et al, 2020). LEK provide reliable, timely and cost-effective data from communities living nearby and interacting with nature (Albuquerque et al, 2021;Allendorf et al, 2020;Brittain et al, 2020;Buchholtz et al, 2020;Pan et al, 2016;Service et al, 2014). LEK surveys can reduce the risk of research equipment such as camera traps being stolen (such as, Caravaggi et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LEK surveys can facilitate the rapid understanding of threats to wildlife, resulting in faster decision-making (Albuquerque et al, 2021;Buchholtz et al, 2020;Haenn et al, 2014). For example, LEK has been used for rapid assessment of the status and threats to pangolin (Manis pentadactyla) (Nash et al, 2016) and to study range shift of grizzly bear (Ursus arctos horribilis) (Service et al, 2014), wildlife presence and abundance, and identification of areas where conservation actions are needed (Allendorf et al, 2020), occupancy and distribution of wildlife (Haenn et al, 2014;Service et al, 2014), and even to study elephant diet in Ethiopia (Biru and Bekele, 2012) and to predict landscape use by elephants in Botswana (Buchholtz et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%