2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00366-021-01392-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating the LSSVM and RBFNN models with three optimization algorithms to predict the soil liquefaction potential

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, a water reducer polymer with one linear backbone consists of side groups of carboxylates (polycarboxylate ether-based polymer). The water reducer polymer is used to treat and change the behavior of cement using carboxylate groups as anchoring groups [10][11][12][13][14]. With a pH of 10, the solid content of the water reducer polymer is larger than 97% (data provided from the supplier).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, a water reducer polymer with one linear backbone consists of side groups of carboxylates (polycarboxylate ether-based polymer). The water reducer polymer is used to treat and change the behavior of cement using carboxylate groups as anchoring groups [10][11][12][13][14]. With a pH of 10, the solid content of the water reducer polymer is larger than 97% (data provided from the supplier).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, plasticity index (PI) has considerable influence on measuring the liquefaction behavior of fine-grained soils on the liquefaction sensitivity of highly plastic soils. Ghani [137,138] and others compared Culture Algorithm (CA), Firefly Algorithm (FA), Genetic Algorithm (GA), Gray Wolf Optimizer (GWO), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Gradient-based optimizer (GBO) combined with artificial neural network for soil liquefaction assessment and concluded that PI and GBO based ANN models are a promising new tool and can help geotechnical engineers to be able to estimate the occurrence of liquefaction in the early stages of engineering projects.…”
Section: Prediction Of Seismic Liquefactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MAE variations with the number of epochs are presented for the preliminarily designed networks. After designing the optimum architecture, the available data set (total of 80 data) was divided into two parts: the first part was 2/3 of the overall data set (57) for training the network; the second part was 1/3 of the total data set (27) for testing the network [20]. Several transfer functions and ANN structures with a varied number of hidden layers and neurons were tested to design the optimal network structure to predict the concrete compressive strength.…”
Section: Intelligence Neural Network (Ann)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various approaches for modeling material properties have been used to predict the flowability [20,21] and strength of concrete [22,23] drilling fluids and mortar [24,25], including numerical simulations, statistical methods, and recently established systematic methods such as regression analysis, M5-Ptree multilinear, and ANN model [26]. Validating experimental results using different model techniques has been successfully used to estimate material properties using linear, nonlinear, and intelligent neural networks in various fields such as soils [26], rocks [27], hydraulic fracturing [28], oil well cement [29], and concrete to save time and reduce project costs [30]. The slump value range was 125-145 mm for the concrete samples modified with polymers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%