2018
DOI: 10.1139/cjfas-2017-0245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating techniques: a review of the effects of anthropogenic noise on freshwater fish

Abstract: In recent years, the effects of anthropogenic noise on freshwater fish has been of increasing interest for fishery managers due to rising levels of this background noise. While it is clear that anthropogenic noise can have important impacts on mammals and marine fish, much less is known about these effects in fresh water. The influence of anthropogenic noise on freshwater fish can be quantified using the same methods as with marine species — through measuring changes in behavioural and physiological outputs. H… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During some months there was a relationship between overall level and calling but the model explained very little variance in calling behaviour in July and was opposite from what has been hypothesised in other studies. While there is good evidence for noise effects in marine systems (Hawkins & Popper, ), there is much less evidence of noise effects in freshwater systems based on field studies (Desjonquères et al., ; Mickle & Higgs, ). In laboratory studies, increased noise levels can affect calling rate in other gobiid species (De Jong, Amorim, Fonseca, Fox, & Heubel, ; De Jong, Amorim, Fonseca, & Heubel, ) and noise may affect spawning success of gobiids using acoustic modalities (De Jong, Amorim, Fonseca, Fox, & Heubel, ; De Jong, Amorim, Fonseca, & Heubel, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…During some months there was a relationship between overall level and calling but the model explained very little variance in calling behaviour in July and was opposite from what has been hypothesised in other studies. While there is good evidence for noise effects in marine systems (Hawkins & Popper, ), there is much less evidence of noise effects in freshwater systems based on field studies (Desjonquères et al., ; Mickle & Higgs, ). In laboratory studies, increased noise levels can affect calling rate in other gobiid species (De Jong, Amorim, Fonseca, Fox, & Heubel, ; De Jong, Amorim, Fonseca, & Heubel, ) and noise may affect spawning success of gobiids using acoustic modalities (De Jong, Amorim, Fonseca, Fox, & Heubel, ; De Jong, Amorim, Fonseca, & Heubel, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Round goby spawning habits also allow us an ideal model to test the effects of anthropogenic noise on a species with less sensitive hearing than many of the species that have been tested to date. Anthropogenic noise is a known ecological stressor in many aquatic habitats (Mickle & Higgs, ; Popper & Hawkins, ) and the levels of noise continue to increase in both marine and freshwater habitats (Frisk, ; Slabbekoorn et al., ). The main driver of increases in anthropogenic noises is boat and ship noise (Frisk, ) and these have been shown to induce behavioural effects in at least some fish species (De Jong, Amorim, Fonseca, Fox, & Heubel, ; De Jong, Amorim, Fonseca, & Heubel, ; De Robertis & Handegard, ; Engås, Misund, Soldal, Horvei, & Solstad, ; Picciulin, Sebastianutto, Codarin, Farina, & Ferrero, ; Sarà et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For those interested in broadening their understanding of general issues of fish bioacoustics (hearing, sound production, behaviour etc . ), there are papers in a volume by Webb et al () as well as several more recent reviews (Ladich, ; Ladich & Fay, ; Mickle & Higgs, ; Putland et al, ). More detailed reviews of potential effects of anthropogenic sound on fishes (and other aquatic animals) can be found in papers by the authors of this review (Hawkins et al, ; Hawkins & Popper, ; Popper & Hawkins, ) and in the reports of several meetings on the Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life (http://www.an-2019.org; Hawkins et al, ; Popper & Hawkins, , and the open access Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics (http://www.go.umd.edu/UcA).…”
Section: Additional Background Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although initial concern regarding anthropogenic sound focussed on the effects upon marine mammals (NMFS, ; NRC, ; Southall et al, ), there is now growing concern over potential effects upon those organisms that make up a much larger part of the aquatic biomass, fishes and more recently, invertebrates and zooplankton (Popper & Hawkins, ). Concern has also been expressed recently over effects upon freshwater fishes (Bolgan et al, ; Mickle & Higgs, ), since they have received far less attention in research on noise effects studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%