2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02227.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating species distribution models and interacting particle systems to predict the spread of an invasive alien plant

Abstract: Aim  We demonstrate how to integrate two widely used tools for modelling the spread of invasive plants, and compare the performance of the combined model with that of its individual components using the recent range dynamics of the invasive annual weed Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. Location  Austria. Methods  Species distribution models, which deliver habitat‐based information on potential distributions, and interacting particle systems, which simulate spatio‐temporal range dynamics as dependent on neighbourhood … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
103
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(140 reference statements)
0
103
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned above, one of the problems with using GLM to model the habitat suitability of an invasive species is that the invasive may not have had an opportunity to invade all habitat types that are suitable for it (Jeschke and Strayner, 2008;Smolik et al, 2010). Since habitat suitability is determined based on the types of habitat that are occupied, habitat that has not yet been invaded despite being suitable, may be incorrectly labelled as unsuitable (Smolik et al, 2010).…”
Section: Distribution Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As mentioned above, one of the problems with using GLM to model the habitat suitability of an invasive species is that the invasive may not have had an opportunity to invade all habitat types that are suitable for it (Jeschke and Strayner, 2008;Smolik et al, 2010). Since habitat suitability is determined based on the types of habitat that are occupied, habitat that has not yet been invaded despite being suitable, may be incorrectly labelled as unsuitable (Smolik et al, 2010).…”
Section: Distribution Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since habitat suitability is determined based on the types of habitat that are occupied, habitat that has not yet been invaded despite being suitable, may be incorrectly labelled as unsuitable (Smolik et al, 2010). However, this problem is not significant if the species is widely dispersed within the study region and can be assumed to have reached all suitable habitat available (Smolik et al, 2010). My research has found that European buckthorn is very widely distributed in Waterloo Region and therefore this is not expected to be a large problem.…”
Section: Distribution Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Species distribution models (SDMs) are one such tool. They are widely used in ecology [6,7] and have broad applications in assessing the relationships between species occurrence, the environment and the impact of ecological change [8]. For invasive species, SDMs are useful for predicting species distributions and ecological niches, and also for assessing potential spread and the suitability of areas that have not yet been invaded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant benefits can be derived from being able to monitor and predict the temporal and spatial dynamics of recent introductions of nonnative plant species. This is critical to cost-efficient management in terms of both the prioritization of control actions (e.g., Ellstrand and Schierenbeck 2000;Mack et al 2000;Smolik et al 2010) and the implementation of rapid-response techniques (e.g., Reichard and Hamilton 1997; Ricciardi et al 2011). Being able to inform these processes is critical, given that financial support for these actions is limited (see Latombe et al 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%