2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.11.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating smart-phone based momentary location tracking with fixed site air quality monitoring for personal exposure assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The temporal variability of TRAP concentrations have also been incorporated into LUR models through the addition of mobile or continuous monitoring allowing for short-term and daily estimates of TRAP exposure for study participants (44, 5558). New data inputs for LUR models, including satellite-derived pollutant measurements (59, 60) and the development of hybrid models combining LUR with Bayesian Maximum Entropy and other statistical approaches have also improved the accuracy of TRAP exposure assessment (61, 62) In studies with available participant-reported time spent in locations outside the home, LUR models have been used to derive time-weighted estimates of exposure based on location (40) More recent application of this time-weighted approach have utilized smartphones and GPS-derived location data to improve estimates of TRAP exposure by combining LUR or other modeled TRAP estimates with individuals’ location through space and time (63)…”
Section: Assessment Of Trap Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temporal variability of TRAP concentrations have also been incorporated into LUR models through the addition of mobile or continuous monitoring allowing for short-term and daily estimates of TRAP exposure for study participants (44, 5558). New data inputs for LUR models, including satellite-derived pollutant measurements (59, 60) and the development of hybrid models combining LUR with Bayesian Maximum Entropy and other statistical approaches have also improved the accuracy of TRAP exposure assessment (61, 62) In studies with available participant-reported time spent in locations outside the home, LUR models have been used to derive time-weighted estimates of exposure based on location (40) More recent application of this time-weighted approach have utilized smartphones and GPS-derived location data to improve estimates of TRAP exposure by combining LUR or other modeled TRAP estimates with individuals’ location through space and time (63)…”
Section: Assessment Of Trap Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mobile phone technology may help to overcome the previous limitations because of its widespread use around the world and the combination of assisted GPS technology and network positioning systems [13-16]. The assisted GPS technology makes use of remote GPS location servers to reduce both power consumption and the time to first fix position [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A distance decay curve was first generated to visualize the correlations between air pollution and land cover categories, which were generated through the object-based classification approach. The LUR model was then run through a deletion/substitution/addition (DSA) machine learning algorithm (Beckerman et al, 2013;Su et al, 2015c) using the aggregated nine land cover categories described above. The DSA algorithm is an aggressive model search algorithm which iteratively generates polynomial generalized linear models based on the existing terms in the current 'best' model and the following three steps:…”
Section: Air Pollution Data and Lur Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%