2018
DOI: 10.1177/1524838018789153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating Sexual Assault Resistance, Bystander, and Men’s Social Norms Strategies to Prevent Sexual Violence on College Campuses: A Call to Action

Abstract: Sexual assault prevention on college campuses often includes programming directed at men, women, and all students as potential bystanders. Problematically, specific types of sexual assault prevention are often implemented on campuses in isolation, and sexual assault risk reduction and resistance education programs for women are rarely integrated with other approaches. With increasing focus on the problem of sexual assault on college campuses, it is timely to envision a comprehensive and interconnected preventi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
150
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(105 reference statements)
4
150
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our actions must be informed by up-to-date prevention guidelines on sexual violence on college/university campuses. But these need to be adapted to address specific issues in academic global health, with programmes for all students and academics (male and female) to address both victimisation and perpetration, and for entire academic communities so that active bystanders can contribute to changing cultural norms and behaviours among peers 5. Such approaches should include: (1) raising awareness; (2) acknowledging barriers to change; and (3) increasing action through skills practice.…”
Section: What Can Academics and Academic Institutions Do?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our actions must be informed by up-to-date prevention guidelines on sexual violence on college/university campuses. But these need to be adapted to address specific issues in academic global health, with programmes for all students and academics (male and female) to address both victimisation and perpetration, and for entire academic communities so that active bystanders can contribute to changing cultural norms and behaviours among peers 5. Such approaches should include: (1) raising awareness; (2) acknowledging barriers to change; and (3) increasing action through skills practice.…”
Section: What Can Academics and Academic Institutions Do?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fund and implement sexual harassment and assault resistance training for students as part of an integrated sexual violence prevention strategy based on the best available evidence 5. Evidence-based programmes exist to help students become more active bystanders39 and better resist sexual violence,40 41 as well as programmes that show promise for reducing male students’ perpetration of sexual violence 42.…”
Section: What Can Academics and Academic Institutions Do?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From old models of sexual assault “prevention” that focused only on women—either providing services after assaults (which, of course, does not actually prevent sexual assault from happening) or instructing them to limit their behavior, “improve” their communication skills, or rely on others for protection—advocates have rightfully moved on to explore “primary prevention” interventions that place responsibility for prevention on perpetrators and on society as a whole (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2004; DeGue et al, 2014). Most of the attention has focused on two strategies: educating potential perpetrators and training bystanders to intervene (Orchowski et al, 2018). Both approaches are worthy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No intervention with men has demonstrated effectiveness in reducing the likelihood of perpetration, and some interventions actually seem to worsen men’s attitudes toward and sympathy for women (Berg et al, 1999; Breitenbecher, 2000; Gidycz et al, 2011). Bystander intervention programs show promise but have yet to demonstrate significant reductions in perpetration or victimization (Banyard et al, 2007; Coker et al, 2015; Orchowski et al, 2018). Moreover, even if perfectly effective, bystander intervention can never prevent 100% of sexual assaults because most assaults do not take place in the presence of other people.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%