2017
DOI: 10.1080/03031853.2017.1387580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating quantified risk in efficiency analysis: evidence from rice production in East and Southern Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was expected because manual weeding is highly labor intensive and farmers do not have many effective alternatives (Rodenburg et al., ). The high technical inefficiency found in this study is consistent with previous studies that indicate rice production is constrained by inefficient use of inputs in SSA (Mujawamariya et al., ). For example, Sherlund et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was expected because manual weeding is highly labor intensive and farmers do not have many effective alternatives (Rodenburg et al., ). The high technical inefficiency found in this study is consistent with previous studies that indicate rice production is constrained by inefficient use of inputs in SSA (Mujawamariya et al., ). For example, Sherlund et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Mujawamariya et al. () argued that in SSA, the risk perceived by rice farmers aggravates inefficiency. The high technical inefficiency of weeding labor can be explained by its crucial role in the production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The region, like the rest of the country, is characterized by diverse farming practices, topographical landforms, and varying levels of farm productivity in terms of efficiency and profitability of rice farms (Abiola et al 2021). According to Mujawamariya et al (2017) and Mutiga et al (2021), the variations in the performance of farms and farmers in sub-Saharan Africa can generally be attributed to the influence of both biotic and abiotic factors, differences in resource endowments, access to credit, adoption of improved technologies, institutional engagement, and management practices, among others.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%