Integrating products and services through life: an aerospace experience

Abstract

PurposeExplores the evolution of 'product-service' (P-S) strategies in the aerospace sector. Despite the widespread perception that aerospace organisations are advanced in terms of P-S integration, little is known about the realities of P-S provision in the sector. Much of the existing literature is normative and prescriptive, focusing upon what organisations aspire to do, but offers little insights into how attempts to integrate products and services occur or the challenges organisations encounter. Design/methodology/approachPresents an in-depth case study of an international aerospace Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM), referred to as 'JetCo'. A total of 18 interviews were conducted with key actors involved in the operationalisation of P-S strategy within defence aerospace and civil aerospace divisions. In addition, analysis of internal company documentation was also undertaken. FindingsReveals that current P-S strategy, which builds upon a long history of service offerings, initially evolved separately in each division in response to the particular markets in which they operate. However, there was evidence of a corporate-wide strategy for P-S provision being developed across divisions to improve co-ordination. This was founded on the recognition that P-S delivery requires the development of a stronger customer orientation, better knowledge and information management strategies, and the engagement of employees. A key challenge concerned integrating the product and service parts of the business to ensure consistent delivery of a seamless value offering to customers. Research limitations/implicationsThe research is limited to a single case organisation in the aerospace sector, and as such the findings are not necessarily generalisable to other contexts. Nevertheless, the research provides important insights into the organisational challenges of P-S provision, and as such the findings are of interest to researchers, managers and policymakers across industries involved in P-S provision. Originality/valueThe paper offers fresh empirical evidence into the development of P-S in an organisation drawn from a sector often flagged as an exemplar of P-S provision, and provides insights into the complex realities of P-S implementation and delivery. Notably, it highlights the challenge of attempting to embed an organisation-wide 'service culture' in pursuit of integrated P-S delivery, and questions the nostrums and overly simplistic models which pervade the current solutions discourse.

Service innovation in manufacturing firms: Evidence from Spain

“…Scholars use various terms to refer to this growth in the importance of services, servitisation (Vandermerwe and Rada, 1988;Baines et al, 2009) and servicisation (Quinn et al, 1990) being the most common, though some authors also refer to it as the rise of product service systems (Johnstone et al, 2009;Pawar et al, 2009;Martinez et al, 2010). The idea of service dominant logic, meanwhile, stresses the fact that some firms acquire goods in order to supply services to their customers or to allow them to self service (Vargo and Lusch, 2004).…”

Innovation in product and services in the shipping retrofit industry: a case study of ballast water treatment systems

“…Pawar et al (2009) describe a case in which an aero-engine manufacturer sells power. Their service guarantees a certain number of flying hours and minimises maintenance (Johnstone et al, 2009). They conclude that a PSS provider must create value through the combined design of a product, the service provided and the organisation to provide the service.…”

Making sense of stakeholder values emergence

“…For example supply chain management (Green et al, 2005;Fernie and Thorpe, 2007), knowledge management (Tennant and Fernie, 2013), organizational learning (Barlow and Jashapara, 1998;Henderson et al, 2013), front-end and service-led approaches (Johnstone et al, 2009;Morrey et al, 2013;Morris and Hiugh, 1988;Edkins, et al, 2013;Morris, 2013), uncertainty (Perminova et al, 2008) and the establishment of customer relationships (Pryke and Smyth 2006;Skitmore and Smyth, 2007;Fellows and Liu, 2013). Still others have discussed the commitment, chemistry and emotional attachment that result from project participation (Nicolini, 2002;Dainty et al, 2005).…”