2011
DOI: 10.1080/0951192x.2011.593047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating process and ontology to support supply chain modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of the former includes knowledge engineering for bespoke software design (Metaxiotis et al, 2001), organisational knowledge management (Davies et al, 2003), and the wider context of ontology/ metaontology development (Berto and Plabani, 2015). Some random illustrations of scientific ontologies pertinent to the CM research domain include those dealing with production (Rooke et al, 2007), knowledge management (Anumba et al, 2008), supply chain modelling (Grubic et al, 2011), and construction informatics (Turk, 2006).…”
Section: Ontological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Examples of the former includes knowledge engineering for bespoke software design (Metaxiotis et al, 2001), organisational knowledge management (Davies et al, 2003), and the wider context of ontology/ metaontology development (Berto and Plabani, 2015). Some random illustrations of scientific ontologies pertinent to the CM research domain include those dealing with production (Rooke et al, 2007), knowledge management (Anumba et al, 2008), supply chain modelling (Grubic et al, 2011), and construction informatics (Turk, 2006).…”
Section: Ontological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. making business decisions (Business Dictionary, 2016) (Anumba et al, 2008), supply chain modelling (Grubic et al, 2011) and construction informatics (Turk, 2006).…”
Section: Ontological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approaches proposed are very diverse and range from more general supply chain modelling topics, typified by the works of Beamon (1998), Min and Zhou (2002) and Biswas and Narahari (2004), to more specific applications of simulation in supply chain modelling and analysis, as those introduced by Huang, Lau, and Mak (2003), Grubic, Veza, and Bilic (2011), Kleijnen (2005) and van der Zee and van der Vorst (2005). The approaches proposed are very diverse and range from more general supply chain modelling topics, typified by the works of Beamon (1998), Min and Zhou (2002) and Biswas and Narahari (2004), to more specific applications of simulation in supply chain modelling and analysis, as those introduced by Huang, Lau, and Mak (2003), Grubic, Veza, and Bilic (2011), Kleijnen (2005) and van der Zee and van der Vorst (2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the two reference models SCOR and the GSCF, which have been widely used in production and SCM, SCOR meets the operation strategy, while the GSCF meets the SCM strategy. SCOR focuses on specific activities in SCM, and the GSCF focuses on the relationship between suppliers and customers; however, neither of them can describe SC processes from different viewpoints nor address the inter-and intra-organization processes in detail (Grubic et al, 2011).…”
Section: Sc Reference Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%