Integrating GIS and expert judgment in a multi-criteria analysis to map and develop a habitat suitability index: A case study of large mammals on the Malayan Peninsula

Abstract

Many habitat patches in tropical landscapes have become less suitable for wildlife due to an increase in anthropogenic disturbances. An index of habitat suitability based on the ecological factors that collectively determine the suitability of an organism's habitat is important for conservation planning. However, a widely accepted and comprehensive multicriteria habitat suitability index for umbrella species is still lacking, particularly in areas where information related to the biology and ecology of the species of interest is not available. Therefore we develop preliminary habitat maps and measure the degree of habitat suitability for large mammals, focusing on four umbrella species in the State of Selangor, Peninsular Malaysia: Panthera tigris jacksoni (Malayan tiger), Tapirus indicus (Malayan tapir), Helarctos malayanus malayanus (Malayan sun bear), and Rusa unicolor cambojensis (sambar deer). The former two are endangered and the latter two are vulnerable according to the IUCN Red List. The suitability of habitat patches for each species was measured across the entire study area as well as in nine wildlife protected areas by integrating GIS data and expert opinion. Expert opinions were used as the source of information regarding the stresses faced by the species because there was insufficient information available from ground surveys. We developed an index and maps of habitat suitability for each species, which were then integrated to represent a combined index (ranging from 0 to 27) and spatially explicit maps of the area's habitat suitability for large mammals. The average large mammal habitat suitability index value of the State of Selangor (9) indicates that many habitat patches have become unsuitable for such species. Of the nine wildlife protected areas, Fraser's Hill (22), Sungai Dusun (22), and Bukit Kutu (21) are very suitable; Klang Gate (20) and Templers Park (17) are suitable; and the remaining four are unsuitable for large mammals. We assume that this preliminary habitat suitability index and mapping are useful for conservation planning of wildlife habitats at both landscape and regional scales, as well as providing an initial foundation for revision by future research with significant new information.

Aquaculture Water Quality Index: a low-cost index to accelerate aquaculture development in Indonesia

“…Their members consisted of officers from Fisheries and Agriculture Agency of the Depok Area, Environmental Protection Local Agency of the Depok Area, the Environmental Protection Agency of West Java Region, and also some professionals. The judgments from them have been used to obtain criteria weights when there is a lack of the required data (Reza et al 2013). They were asked to rank the priority values according to their experiences using a ratio scale and verbal judgments of preference which requires no units in the comparison (Kainulainen et al 2009; Table 3).…”

A condition metric for Eucalyptus woodland derived from expert evaluations

“…These approaches are frequently combined, such that consultation leads to a metric that reflects ecosystem quality, in a way that conforms to the views of stakeholders and the scientific literature (Geneletti ; Reza et al. ). The process of metric construction often involves the delineation of a benchmark for the ecosystem that defines the highest conceivable quality.…”

The Function of Plantation Forestry in Landscape Connectivity

“…We conducted an analysis of landscape connectivity by integrating methods of graph-based habitat availability (reachability) metrics and least-cost path matrices Ziólkowska et al, 2012), that allow the identification of key nodes providing connectivity. This is a valuable contribution for forest management tools, especially when the alterations of human disturbances to specific patches rendering some unsuitable, or reducing their ability to provide appropriate habitats for wildlife, are considered (Reza et al, 2013). In this way, forests managers and land planners can identify where management and conservation efforts should be concentrated and prioritized.…”