2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.12.20.473413
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated view and comparative analysis of baseline protein expression in mouse and rat tissues

Abstract: The increasingly large amount of public proteomics data enables, among other applications, the combined analyses of datasets to create comparative protein expression maps covering different organisms and different biological conditions. Here we have reanalysed public proteomics datasets from mouse and rat tissues (14 and 9 datasets, respectively), to assess baseline protein abundance. Overall, the aggregated dataset contains 23 individual datasets, which have a total of 211 samples coming from 34 different tis… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 168 identified core matrisome proteins in this study, 95 (56.5%) were shared between all tissues, while only 2 (NTN1 and VWA2) were unique to a single tissue sample (Figure 2B). This contrasts with a recent review of primarily cellular proteomic datasets across 8 mouse organs, which found that 46.9% of identified protein groups were unique to a single organ and only 0.16% of protein groups were identified in all organs 36 . For comparison, 44% of identified proteins were identified in all tissues within the dataset generated by the Human Protein Atlas (HUPA) project 37 .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…Of the 168 identified core matrisome proteins in this study, 95 (56.5%) were shared between all tissues, while only 2 (NTN1 and VWA2) were unique to a single tissue sample (Figure 2B). This contrasts with a recent review of primarily cellular proteomic datasets across 8 mouse organs, which found that 46.9% of identified protein groups were unique to a single organ and only 0.16% of protein groups were identified in all organs 36 . For comparison, 44% of identified proteins were identified in all tissues within the dataset generated by the Human Protein Atlas (HUPA) project 37 .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…The Expression Atlas (EA) ‘bulk’ database has two sections: baseline and differential, and already integrates some proteomics data. This data has been generated from reanalysis of human, mouse, rat and cell-line public datasets, all of which have been derived from Data Dependent Acquisition (DDA) 911 . The availability of such results in EA therefore supports the integration of proteomics with transcriptomics information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison analyses were performed to evaluate changes in the z-score for each function over time and across species and reveal biological pathways underlying toxicity-specific phenotypes. Since the mouse and rat SWATH datasets were analysed separately, log 2 transformed normalised protein expression values of orthologous proteins from the 0 h control animals (untreated) were ranked and grouped into 10 bins within each dataset for comparison of basal protein abundances across species (30). Proteins with the lowest protein abundance values were assigned to bin 1, whereas those with the highest abundance values were assigned to bin 10.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%