2019
DOI: 10.1101/584185
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated Open-Source Software for Multiscale Electrophysiology

Abstract: 16The methods for electrophysiology in neuroscience have evolved tremendously over the recent 17 years with a growing emphasis on dense-array signal recordings. Such increased complexity and 18 augmented wealth in the volume of data recorded, have not been accompanied by efforts to 19 streamline and facilitate access to processing methods, which too are susceptible to grow in 20 sophistication. Moreover, unsuccessful attempts to reproduce peer-reviewed publications 21 indicate a problem of transparency in scie… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recordings can be loaded and analyzed from six different file formats: Blackrock, Ripple, Plexon, Intan, NWB, and Tucker Davis Technologies. is available on GitHub ( https://github.com/brainstorm-tools/brainstorm3 ; Nasiotis et al, 2019b ) and its functionality is documented ( https://neuroimage.usc.edu/brainstorm/e-phys/Introduction ). does not include the latest spike sorting software ( Rossant et al, 2016 ; Yger et al, 2018 ; Chung et al, 2017 ; Jun et al, 2017b ; Pachitariu et al, 2018 ; Hilgen et al, 2017 ) ( does include instructions on how to import data that has been spike sorted by a non-supported spike sorter), and it does not support any post-sorting analysis such as quality metric calculation, automated curation, or sorting output comparison.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recordings can be loaded and analyzed from six different file formats: Blackrock, Ripple, Plexon, Intan, NWB, and Tucker Davis Technologies. is available on GitHub ( https://github.com/brainstorm-tools/brainstorm3 ; Nasiotis et al, 2019b ) and its functionality is documented ( https://neuroimage.usc.edu/brainstorm/e-phys/Introduction ). does not include the latest spike sorting software ( Rossant et al, 2016 ; Yger et al, 2018 ; Chung et al, 2017 ; Jun et al, 2017b ; Pachitariu et al, 2018 ; Hilgen et al, 2017 ) ( does include instructions on how to import data that has been spike sorted by a non-supported spike sorter), and it does not support any post-sorting analysis such as quality metric calculation, automated curation, or sorting output comparison.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the various works in this line, we find three specifically that deal with similar problems. The first two focus on aspects of computer vision for the quantitative determination of behavior tests [3], while the last one shows an electrophysiological recording software in rodents [10].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most recently, Nasiotis et al [56] implemented IN-Brainstorm, a MATLAB-based GUI designed for the analysis of invasive neurophysiology data. IN-Brainstorm allows users to run three spike sorting packages, (Wave clus [19], UltraMegaSort2000 [37], and Kilosort [59]).…”
Section: Comparison To Other Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work to standardize the field has focused on developing open-source frameworks that make extracellular analysis and spike sorting more accessible [26,16,35,29,33,13,45,14,57,43,48,15,61,76,56]. While useful tools in their own right, these frameworks only implement a limited suite of spike sorting technologies since their main focus is to provide entire extracellular analysis pipelines (spike trains, LFPs, EEG, and more).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%