2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)62061-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated Computer Aided Design for Assembly Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the automated assembly technology has become a hotspot of the current research. However, it exists some disadvantages of the automated assembly technology, such as inefficiency, high cost and complex mechanical structure [4] [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the automated assembly technology has become a hotspot of the current research. However, it exists some disadvantages of the automated assembly technology, such as inefficiency, high cost and complex mechanical structure [4] [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Swaminathan [18] presented integrated models applicable at a plant level that can provide quantification of certain operational benefits, through a computational study, also provide qualitative insights on several issues. Boer, C.R [19] presented the research and development of an integrated computer aided design for assembly system. The main research aim was to obtain methodologies and tools to design and manage a complete flexible assembly system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of different frameworks for the configuration and design of products and system has been proposed (Bley et al, 1994;Lu et al, 2000;Boer et al, 2001;Jin and Lu, 2004). Distributed collaborative design frameworks provide clear advantages for the considered design problem as discussed by Rosenman and Wang (2001) particularly when combined with object and component oriented modelling approaches as are commonly used under the CIM paradigm (Schafer and Lbpez, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%