2015
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated Approach to Overcome Shortcomings in Current Delay Analysis Practices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(a) the financial difficulties of customers and/or owners (CHALLAL; TKIOUAT, 2012;FUGAR;AGYAKWAH-BAAH, 2010;LARSEN et al, 2016 (ALAGHBARI et al, 2007;KHARASHI et al, 2009); (e) poor project planning (DUY; OGUNLANA, 2004;KHOSHGOFTAR et al, 2010); (g) low availability and productivity of labor (ABDUL-RAHMAN et al, 2006;KUMARASWAMY;CHAN, 1998); and 30 (h) late delivery or poor quality of materials (KOUSHKI; KARTAM, 2004;RAHMAN et al, 2017). Also, there are unpredictable events, poor technical capacity of local teams of contractors or consultants, poorly designed projects, adverse climatic conditions, increased production, among other causes of delay (AL-MOMANI, 2000;BEKTAS, 2015;HASEEB;BIBI, 2011). Gebrehiwet and Luo (2017) also highlight corruption, inflation and unavailability of supplies in the construction sites as causes of delay in services.…”
Section: Delay In Construction Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(a) the financial difficulties of customers and/or owners (CHALLAL; TKIOUAT, 2012;FUGAR;AGYAKWAH-BAAH, 2010;LARSEN et al, 2016 (ALAGHBARI et al, 2007;KHARASHI et al, 2009); (e) poor project planning (DUY; OGUNLANA, 2004;KHOSHGOFTAR et al, 2010); (g) low availability and productivity of labor (ABDUL-RAHMAN et al, 2006;KUMARASWAMY;CHAN, 1998); and 30 (h) late delivery or poor quality of materials (KOUSHKI; KARTAM, 2004;RAHMAN et al, 2017). Also, there are unpredictable events, poor technical capacity of local teams of contractors or consultants, poorly designed projects, adverse climatic conditions, increased production, among other causes of delay (AL-MOMANI, 2000;BEKTAS, 2015;HASEEB;BIBI, 2011). Gebrehiwet and Luo (2017) also highlight corruption, inflation and unavailability of supplies in the construction sites as causes of delay in services.…”
Section: Delay In Construction Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. (2009),Pourrostam and Ismail (2011), Pourrostam, Ismail and Mansourenejad (2011a, 2011b,Saeb, Khayat and Telvari (2016) andShahsavand, Marefat and Parchamijalal (2018) andBirgonul (2018),Birgonul, Dikmen and Bektas (2015),Gunduz, Nielsen and Ösdemir (2013, 2015) andKazaz, Ulubeyli and Tuncbilekli (), El-Razek, Bassioni and Mobarak (2008),Marzouk and El-Rasas (2014) andMarzouk, El-Dokhmasey and El-Said (et al (2006),Hasmori et al (2018) andMydin et al …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While early studies had a narrow focus that missed critical frontend and institutional elements, the focus has broadened significantly in recent studies [14]. Two of the most common infrastructure project delivery factors are time and cost overruns, which have been explored in a number of different ways [15][16][17]. Even though the factors of time and cost overruns in infrastructure projects have been studied extensively, few studies focus on capacity as a main factor of time and cost overruns.…”
Section: Urban Infrastructure Project Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, construction delay claims have received more considerable efforts aimed at enhancing delay claim settlements and reducing the high level of disputes [4][5][6]. This includes the needs for improvement which can reduce the impact of delay analysis issues and increase the efficiency of delay analysis techniques (DATs) [7,8]. However, there are several issues that have a potential impact on the delay analysis results, which have not been considered in the delay analysis [9], especially when the external events are involved in the construction delay claims.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it has been stated that a delay that would ordinarily be non-compensable may be transformed into a compensable delay [15] (pp. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11], this is not popular in delay analysis. For example, a case of force majeure delay that would not have occurred to the schedule if the project would have been completed during the original contract period is a situation in which force majeure can demand compensation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%