Insurance Differences in Preventive Care Use and Adverse Birth Outcomes Among Pregnant Women in a Medicaid Nonexpansion State: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Abstract

Background: Lack of quality preventive care has been associated with poorer outcomes for pregnant women with low incomes. Health policy changes implemented with the Affordable Care Act (ACA) were designed to improve access to care. However, insurance coverage remains lower among women in Medicaid nonexpansion states. We compared health care use and adverse birth outcomes by insurance status among women giving birth in a large health system in a Medicaid nonexpansion state. Materials and Methods: We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study using data for 9,613 women with deliveries during 2014-2015 at six hospitals associated with a large vertically integrated health care system in North Carolina. Adjusted logistic regression and zero-inflated negative binomial models examined associations between insurance status at delivery (commercial, Medicaid, or uninsured) and health care utilization (well-woman visits, late prenatal care, adequacy of prenatal care, postpartum follow-up, and emergency department [ED] visits) and outcomes (preterm birth, low birth weight, preeclampsia, and gestational diabetes). Results: Having Medicaid at delivery was associated with lower rates of well-woman visits (rate ratio [RR] 0.25, 95% CI 0.23-0.28), higher rates of ED visits (RR 2.93, 95% CI 2.64-3.25), and higher odds of late prenatal care (odds ratio [OR] 1.18, 95% CI 1.03-1.34) compared to having commercial insurance, with similar results for uninsured women. Differences in adverse pregnancy outcomes were not statistically significant after adjusting for patient characteristics. Conclusions: Findings suggest that large gaps exist in use of preventive care between Medicaid/uninsured and commercially insured women. Policymakers should consider ways to improve potential and realized access to care.

Does Health Insurance Affect the Completeness of Antenatal Care?

“…The implementation is on the right track, following what is the goal of universal health insurance (Agustina et al, 2019;Anindya et al, 2020;Johar et al, 2018). The positive effects of health insurance in Indonesia which have a positive impact on increasing public access to health services, have also been reported in several previous studies in various countries (Sanogo & Yaya, 2020;Taylor et al, 2020;Wu et al, 2020)insurance coverage remains lower among women in Medicaid nonexpansion states. We compared health care use and adverse birth outcomes by insurance status among women giving birth in a large health system in a Medicaid nonexpansion state.…”

Chlamydia Prevalence by Age and Correlates of Infection Among Pregnant Women

“… 11 Many adverse outcomes have been documented in adults without medical insurance, including pregnancy outcomes. 27 Improving access to high-quality prenatal care is critical to improving health outcomes that depend on the detection and treatment of chlamydia in asymptomatic and symptomatic women. 28 , 29 …”

Social Stigma and Perinatal Substance Use Services: Recognizing the Power of the Good Mother Ideal

“…North Carolina is located in the southern part of the United States, which has higher incidences of maternal opioid use and is the region least likely to offer the gold standard practice of MAT (Hand et al, 2017). The state is a member of the "bible belt," has enacted conservative policies, such as refusing the expansion of Medicaid (Taylor et al, 2019), and is geographically surrounded by states that have a history of prosecuting women for using substances while pregnant (Amnesty International, 2017; Bridges, 2020). In spite of this, North Carolina has had a progressive response to the opioid epidemic generally (Kasanga & Cohen, 2018), and to the issue of maternal opioid use specifically (Nichols & Gringle, 2020).…”