2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.01.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insulin loaded mucus permeating nanoparticles: Addressing the surface characteristics as feature to improve mucus permeation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to PEGylation, N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide polymer (pHPMA) 174,176,177 and poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) 178 were recently tested as alternative mucoinert coatings, with some success. A dense coating of opposite charges has shown effectiveness in multiple different contexts, including viruses (as discussed above), self-assembled nanoparticles comprised of distinct ratios of polycationic chitosan and polyanionic poly(acrylic acid) (also in mucus), 26,179 zwitterionic dilauroylphosphatidylcholine monolayer-coated nanoparticles (in intestinal mucus), 180 and liposomes with zwitterionic dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine membranes (in biofilms and respiratory mucus as an inhaled treatment carrying amikacin, an aminoglycoside; currently in clinical trials). 172 Not all of these coatings provide ideal protection against gel interactions, and in particular polymer brushes form a useful physical adsorption barrier in addition to a biochemical one.…”
Section: Selective Transport Of Objects On the Order Of Mesh Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to PEGylation, N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide polymer (pHPMA) 174,176,177 and poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) 178 were recently tested as alternative mucoinert coatings, with some success. A dense coating of opposite charges has shown effectiveness in multiple different contexts, including viruses (as discussed above), self-assembled nanoparticles comprised of distinct ratios of polycationic chitosan and polyanionic poly(acrylic acid) (also in mucus), 26,179 zwitterionic dilauroylphosphatidylcholine monolayer-coated nanoparticles (in intestinal mucus), 180 and liposomes with zwitterionic dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine membranes (in biofilms and respiratory mucus as an inhaled treatment carrying amikacin, an aminoglycoside; currently in clinical trials). 172 Not all of these coatings provide ideal protection against gel interactions, and in particular polymer brushes form a useful physical adsorption barrier in addition to a biochemical one.…”
Section: Selective Transport Of Objects On the Order Of Mesh Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…PEGylation is one of the approaches that used PEG coat as hydrophilic mucus inert polymer to facilitate mucus penetration of insulin‐loaded carriers . Virus‐mimicking strategy has been combined with PEGylation technique in a study for oral insulin delivery as a model of utilizing two different concepts for mucus penetration systems . The specific design, PEG molecular weight requirements, limited cellular uptake and induction of anti‐PEG antibodies might be considered potential limitations of PEGylation technology .…”
Section: Less Invasive Insulin Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[85] Chitosan-4-thiobutylamidine insulin-loaded tablets showed controlled release in non-diabetic rats for over 8 h. [86] Mucus penetration is another technology introduced to overcome the dynamic upstream mucus barrier resulted from its rapid turnover kinetics. [87][88][89] Efficient mucus penetration of an insulin carrier requires highly densely charged surface (virus-mimicking strategy), coating of insulin carrier with hydrophilic mucus inert polymer and neutral to slightly negative charged surface (to minimize electrostatic interaction with mucus). [87] PEGylation is one of the approaches that used PEG coat as hydrophilic mucus inert polymer to facilitate mucus penetration of insulin-loaded carriers.…”
Section: Formulation Barriermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BET analysis also demonstrated the presence of mesopores of about 20 nm for the polymer, leading to similar characteristics to those of a type IV isotherm, so their nanospace pores can be distinguished from NIPs. In the case of NIPs, the pore diameter was larger and the isotherm exhibited a type III curve characteristic due to the nonporous structure with low interaction (28). That insulin recognition sites formed within the nanospace pores was further corroborated by a bomb calorimeter.…”
Section: Surface Area and Pore Size Distribution Of Insulin Mipsmentioning
confidence: 74%