2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.inteco.2020.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insulating property of the flexible exchange rate regime: A case of Central and Eastern European countries

Abstract: We examine the insulating property of flexible exchange rate in CEE economies using the fact that they have adopted different regimes. A set of Bayesian structural VAR models with common serial correlations is estimated on data spanning 1998q1-2015q4. The long-term identifying restrictions are derived from a macroeconomic model. We find that irrespective of the exchange rate regime output is driven mainly by real shocks. Its reactions to these shocks, however, are substantially stronger under less flexible reg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dominance of real shocks suggests that the real exchange rate is a stabilizing mechanism in the Albanian economy and lends support to the “equilibrium” or “real economy” view of exchange rates consistent with evidence from Erjavec et al ( 2012 ), Dabrowski and Wroblewska ( 2016 ) findings for Poland, Audzei and Brázdik ( 2018 ), and Dabrowski and Wroblewska ( 2020 ). Our findings contradict evidence from Shevchuk ( 2014 ), where more than 80% of variability in the nominal exchange rate is explained by nominal shocks.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The dominance of real shocks suggests that the real exchange rate is a stabilizing mechanism in the Albanian economy and lends support to the “equilibrium” or “real economy” view of exchange rates consistent with evidence from Erjavec et al ( 2012 ), Dabrowski and Wroblewska ( 2016 ) findings for Poland, Audzei and Brázdik ( 2018 ), and Dabrowski and Wroblewska ( 2020 ). Our findings contradict evidence from Shevchuk ( 2014 ), where more than 80% of variability in the nominal exchange rate is explained by nominal shocks.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In line with our findings, after examining ten CEE countries during 1998–1917, Audzei and Brázdik ( 2018 ) conclude that the real exchange rate is a shock absorber and that in none of the countries is the real exchange rate a major source business cycle volatility. Similarly, Dabrowski and Wroblewska ( 2020 ), who study the effects of exchange rates in eight CEE economies with fixed and floating regimes, show that in spite of the exchange rate regime, output is driven mainly by real shocks, but it is less responsive to these shocks under more flexible exchange rates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Earlier studies for the CEE countries are mostly in favour of contractionary exchange rate depreciations (Bahmani-Oskooee & Miteza, 2006;Bahmani-Oskooee & Kutan, 2008;Miteza, 2006), but recent studies incline towards a more favourable treatment of a weaker currency (Cuestas, Monfort, & Ordóñez, 2019;Cizmović, Shachmurove, & Vulanovic, 2021). In turn, it strengthens an argument in favour of a floating exchange rate regime (Dabrowski & Wroblewska, 2020;Ihnatov & Capraru, 2012). However, a stronger exchange rate anchor is suggested for inflation-targeting emerging economies as a better resistance tool for the inflationary shocks like in the 2007-2008 pre-crisis period (Pourroy, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The seminal work of Friedman (1953) 2 emphasized the importance of exchange rate regimes in determining nations’ economic competence. Besides, various prominent studies (Dabrowski & Wroblewska, 2020; Fleming, 1962; Swallow-Carriere et al, 2018) argue that the intrinsic features of flexible exchange rate regimes and frequent exchange rate flexibility can work as a blessing in disguise as it facilitates the adjustment of economies to the real shocks. Self-directed monetary policy common in the market-determined exchange rate system(s) in the presence of sturdy and brisk international capital mobility provides an opportunity to stabilize the local economy without any external meddling (Dornbusch & Giovani, 1990; Dornbusch & Park, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%