2013
DOI: 10.1249/mss.0b013e31827772f6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insufficient Hamstring Strength Compromises Landing Technique in Adolescent Girls

Abstract: Girls with reduced hamstring strength appear to have a decreased capacity to control lower limb frontal plane alignment. This reduced capacity appears to contribute to increased ACL loading and, in turn, increased potential for injury.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the results of this study are not consistent with results reported by Wild et al (54) in which girls with lower hamstring strength displayed greater knee abduction angle and greater ACL loading during landing from a leap compared with girls with higher hamstring strength. Athletes with less hamstring stiffness also displayed greater abduction moment, greater peak anterior tibial shear force, and less knee flexion angle at critical time points during landing than individuals with greater hamstring stiffness (7).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, the results of this study are not consistent with results reported by Wild et al (54) in which girls with lower hamstring strength displayed greater knee abduction angle and greater ACL loading during landing from a leap compared with girls with higher hamstring strength. Athletes with less hamstring stiffness also displayed greater abduction moment, greater peak anterior tibial shear force, and less knee flexion angle at critical time points during landing than individuals with greater hamstring stiffness (7).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The time of peak posterior GRF (PPF) was identified as a critical time point for knee loading (32,60). Knee kinematic and kinetic variables at this critical time, including knee flexion angle (17,54), knee extension moment (17,54), knee abduction angle (54), knee adduction moment (54), the peak anterior tibial shear force (10), the peak lateral tibial shear force, hip adduction angle (27), and hip adduction moment (24), were used for evaluating the ACL injury risk. Jump height, which was used for evaluating stop-jump performance, was calculated by subtracting the vertical coordinates of the center of mass during the static trial from the maximum vertical coordinates of the center of mass during the stop-jump trials.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given technical competency progression to Olympic-style weight lifting may bring about desirable adaptions to ligament thickness and timing of muscle contractions in jumping and landing tasks (2,21). Appropriate hamstring strengthening exercises should also be included as part of a balanced program (40), particularly given the potential relationship between hamstring strength and landing control (58). Movement skill mastery and exercise progressions should be individualized, so the above examples serve as general guidelines only.…”
Section: Long-term Athlete Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research has attempted to explore the relationships between strength, muscle activity and landing biomechanics. For example, Wild et al (2013) examined lower limb kinematics of the hip, knee and ankle, ACL forces and muscle activity of six lower limb muscles (Medial Gastrocnemius, Tibialis Anterior, Vastus Medialis, Rectus Femoris, Semitendinosis and Biceps Femoris) during a single-leg horizontal landing in high (n = 11) and low (n = 11) concentric hamstring strength groups of pubescent females. The results showed that the low hamstring strength group displayed significantly greater knee valgus angles at the time of maximum vertical and anterioposterior ground reaction forces (GRF), significantly less hip abduction moments at the time of maximum vertical GRF and significantly greater ACL force at the time of maximum anterioposterior GRF compared with the high hamstring strength group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%