2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Instructional methods and languages in class: A comparison of two teaching approaches and two teaching languages in the field of intercultural learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that engaging in intercultural contact (learning about others) and exploring one's own cultural background (learning about oneself) are both related to higher CQ among adolescents, and that CQ increases with age. Our results suggest that apart from explicit intercultural trainings (e.g., Busse & Krause, ), it may also be possible to foster CQ in daily (school) life, by encouraging intercultural contact and stimulating students to critically reflect on their own heritage, cultural beliefs, and biases. Contact is especially likely to promote CQ when individuals are confronted with diversity and when individuals engage in cognitive effort to resolve these inconsistencies (Tadmor & Tetlock, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…We found that engaging in intercultural contact (learning about others) and exploring one's own cultural background (learning about oneself) are both related to higher CQ among adolescents, and that CQ increases with age. Our results suggest that apart from explicit intercultural trainings (e.g., Busse & Krause, ), it may also be possible to foster CQ in daily (school) life, by encouraging intercultural contact and stimulating students to critically reflect on their own heritage, cultural beliefs, and biases. Contact is especially likely to promote CQ when individuals are confronted with diversity and when individuals engage in cognitive effort to resolve these inconsistencies (Tadmor & Tetlock, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…We observed a large, significant interaction effect because negative affect was particularly low in the experimental group after Lessons 1 and 5, but it was slightly elevated in the control group compared to Lessons 2, 3, and 4. Because the students in intervention group had engaged in the two affective‐experiential activities in Lessons 1 and 5, the data seemed to provide further evidence for the usefulness of such activities for promoting positive affect in EFL teaching (see also Busse & Krause, ; Busse et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Age‐appropriate alternatives could include affective‐experiential learning activities because they are less abstract. Affective‐experiential learning draws on students’ emotions and involves learning through reflection on one's own experience, which has been shown to be beneficial for student motivation and for addressing the attitudinal dimensions of learning (e.g., Busse & Krause, ; Busse, Riedesel, & Krause, ).…”
Section: Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their work reveals the role of the computer as an important aid to the teacher (Beaty, 2010); examines main provisions of its application in training, control and implementing research (Chapelle, 2001); give practical recommendations to teachers on using the Internet in class (Dudeney, 2007). At the same time, foreign researchers are turning to new interactive methods of teaching foreign languages (Abdyhalykova, 2016, Busse -Krause, 2016) as a part of forming intercultural communication (Lin -Ying, 2014). Thus, foreign researchers laid the foundations of programmed learning, revealed its advantages and disadvantages, substantiated its principles and the application technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%