2009
DOI: 10.1080/00036840601007435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutions, capital stock and wage setting in Spain

Abstract: This paper confronts two distinct perspectives of the labour market: the institutionalist view -highlighting equilibrium and labour market institutions- and the Chain Reaction Theory -emphasising dynamics and the growth drivers' role in labour market performance-. We consider the ratio of public to private capital stock as a growth driver relevant to the labour market; provide different economic rationales for this ratio to exert a negative influence in wage setting; and explore its empirical relevance in the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, numerous studies pointed to capital accumulation having more explanatory power than labour institutions when explaining the unemployment rate (Bande and Karanassou, 2014;Karanassou and Sala, 2014;Rowthorn, 1999;Sala, 2009). Despite these studies' focus on medium-term dynamics, they also stress the role of aggregate demand and, especially, investment in GDP growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, numerous studies pointed to capital accumulation having more explanatory power than labour institutions when explaining the unemployment rate (Bande and Karanassou, 2014;Karanassou and Sala, 2014;Rowthorn, 1999;Sala, 2009). Despite these studies' focus on medium-term dynamics, they also stress the role of aggregate demand and, especially, investment in GDP growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some papers have also investigated the issue focusing on single countries (e.g Simo´n et al, 2006;Sala, 2009)Alesina and Perotti (1997) only consider the degree of centralization of wage bargaining, whileDaveri and Tabellini (2000) also consider union density, coverage and coordination.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%