Institutionelle Erneuerungsfähigkeit Der Forschung 2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-531-94274-2_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutionelle Erneuerung durch Fusion? Vergleich von Hochschulfusionen in Deutschland und Großbritannien

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Development Whereas mergers in higher education have been widespread in the U.S., U.K., Australia, and the Netherlands since the 1970s (Goedegebuure 1992 ;Harman and Harman 2003 ;Harman and Meek 1988 ;Skodvin 1999 ), in Germany mergers are a fairly new phenomenon. Motives for these mergers are profi le development, quality improvement, raising visibility, economies of scale, and synergy effects to improve the position in competitive education markets (Battke and Cremer-Renz 2006 ;Pruisken 2012 ;Weber 2009 ). Empirically, the majority of the few mergers in Germany still refl ect state-decreed cost-reduction policies (Pruisken 2012 ).…”
Section: Mergers Of Higher Education Institutions For Cost Effi Ciencmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Development Whereas mergers in higher education have been widespread in the U.S., U.K., Australia, and the Netherlands since the 1970s (Goedegebuure 1992 ;Harman and Harman 2003 ;Harman and Meek 1988 ;Skodvin 1999 ), in Germany mergers are a fairly new phenomenon. Motives for these mergers are profi le development, quality improvement, raising visibility, economies of scale, and synergy effects to improve the position in competitive education markets (Battke and Cremer-Renz 2006 ;Pruisken 2012 ;Weber 2009 ). Empirically, the majority of the few mergers in Germany still refl ect state-decreed cost-reduction policies (Pruisken 2012 ).…”
Section: Mergers Of Higher Education Institutions For Cost Effi Ciencmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motives for these mergers are profi le development, quality improvement, raising visibility, economies of scale, and synergy effects to improve the position in competitive education markets (Battke and Cremer-Renz 2006 ;Pruisken 2012 ;Weber 2009 ). Empirically, the majority of the few mergers in Germany still refl ect state-decreed cost-reduction policies (Pruisken 2012 ). The reforms of external governance were designed to increase the autonomy of universities and encourage competition among them.…”
Section: Mergers Of Higher Education Institutions For Cost Effi Ciencmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motives for these mergers are profile development, quality improvement, raising visibility, economies of scale, and synergy effects to improve the position in competitive education markets (Battke & Cremer-Renz, 2006;Pruisken, 2012;Weber, 2009). Empirically, the majority of the few mergers in Germany still reflect state-decreed cost-reduction policies (Pruisken, 2012).…”
Section: Mergers Of Higher Education Institutions For Cost Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirically, the majority of the few mergers in Germany still reflect state-decreed cost-reduction policies (Pruisken, 2012). The reforms of external governance were designed to increase the autonomy of universities and encourage competition among them.…”
Section: Mergers Of Higher Education Institutions For Cost Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%