This paper discusses the impact of the dynamics of motivation on new organizational forms that are suited to forge value-creating knowledge transfers in teams and between organizational units and functions. Our aim is to develop the management of motivation as a source of distinctive firm competences. We argue that motivation is an endogenous variable and introduce it as a crucial link into the theory of the firm. Balancing intrinsic and extrinsic motivation helps to overcome social dilemmas in firms that are not solvable by hierarchical authority. Integrating the dynamics of motivation is a step to a more comprehensive theory of organization. It links organizational economics to the knowledge-based perspective.Motivation, Organizational Forms, Knowledge Transfer, Firm-SPECIFIC Pool Resources,

No abstract

This paper contributes to the development of conceptual work on collective corruption in the private sector. Based on a routines-as-practice perspective, we conceptualize collective corruption as routines which are established patterns of organizational actions that are made up of rules as their basic building blocks, the interpretation of these rules in the context of an organizational framework and the actual observable performance patterns. Drawing on 24 interviews with representatives of law enforcement authorities, auditing and law firms, non-profit organizations and anti-corruption units in the public sector, we provide a framework that combines theoretical reasoning with qualitative data analysis in order to describe the dynamics of corrupt routines. Our results disclose their main characteristics and highlight how the specificity of rules, lack of control, the power to influence subjective understandings and actions as well as group processes influence the relations between rules, their interpretation and performances and, thus, give rise to corrupt routines.

Knowledge governance involves overcoming knowledge dilemmas. These dilemmas result from the public-good characteristics of knowledge: nonrivalry and non-excludability. The aim of this paper is to provide a framework in which a repertoire of governance modes and mechanisms is developed and evaluated according to the public-good characteristics of knowledge resources. Based on the theories of public good, social dilemma and organisation, we derive propositions for effectively governing the creation, sharing and use of knowledge resources. Relying on a case study in the telecommunications industry with data from 42 narrative interviews, we mix theoretical reasoning with qualitative data analysis in order to specify the theoretically derived propositions. Our results show how the two actor-oriented characteristics cognitive proximity and procedural adherence influence the choice of different governance modes.Reference to this paper should be made as follows: Frost, J. and Morner, M. (2010) 'Overcoming knowledge dilemmas: governing the creation, sharing and use of knowledge resources', Int.

No abstract