2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional theory and HRM: A new look

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
139
2
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 167 publications
3
139
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, we took a closer look at the IHRM articles that referred to institutional theory. In doing so, we found that almost all of these can be categorized as representing ‘the old neo institutionalism’ (Lewis et al, 2019: 317). Their authors ask the almost classic question of how the institutional environment and related pressures shape the HRM practices of local companies or foreign MNCs operating within or across country contexts (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, we took a closer look at the IHRM articles that referred to institutional theory. In doing so, we found that almost all of these can be categorized as representing ‘the old neo institutionalism’ (Lewis et al, 2019: 317). Their authors ask the almost classic question of how the institutional environment and related pressures shape the HRM practices of local companies or foreign MNCs operating within or across country contexts (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This view, however, does not take into consideration the impact of human agency and the possibility that organizations actively shape the environments in which they are embedded. Approaches that account for the interplay between structure and agency can be referred to as representing the ‘new neo institutionalism’ (Lewis et al, 2019: 323). They offer fruitful directions for HRM research in that scholars may not only concentrate on existing institutional constraints but instead focus on HR managers as active agents (Farndale et al, 2018) and on, for instance, how they deal with the daily complexities and paradoxes of different value system and competing demands (Lewis et al, 2019; cf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Keohane and Nye (1988), the institutional theory of complex interdependence is rich when it explores the fact of promoting a number of relevant international discussions, and simultaneously uninterrupted and gradually accelerated by information/communication technology. Another important dimension of the theory is that it becomes accessible to everyone, rich or poor, big or small, weak or strong, and not just to statesmen or diplomats, as long as they do it in an organized way, as seen with the effort to organize civil society around specific demands (Comyns 2018; Lewis et al 2018).…”
Section: Institutional Arrangements To Consolidate Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commitment measures give birth to a strong desire to remain a member of a particular organization and a commitment to the values and goals of the organization (Al_Jabari_and_Ghazzawi, 2019). Institutional work discusses agencies at the daily level, exploring how actors create, maintain and confuse the institutional context in which they are involved (Lewis et al, 2018).…”
Section: Commitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%