2000
DOI: 10.2307/2669273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional Reform and Decision-Making Efficiency in the European Union

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
144
2
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
144
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, König and Bräuninger (1998) found that the pace of decision-making appeared to be slowing down over time, not least since the European Parliament's leverage increased. This finding was supported in Schulz and König (2000) and by König and Bräuninger (2002). Sloot and Verschuren (1990), an earlier study in this tradition, found that the introduction of the cooperation procedure in the mid-1980s with the ratification of the Single European Act (SEA) had a positive effect on the swiftness of decision-making by increasing the use of qualified majority voting (QMV) instead of unanimity in the Council.…”
Section: Winning Coalitions and The Analysis Of Decision Efficiencysupporting
confidence: 56%
“…By contrast, König and Bräuninger (1998) found that the pace of decision-making appeared to be slowing down over time, not least since the European Parliament's leverage increased. This finding was supported in Schulz and König (2000) and by König and Bräuninger (2002). Sloot and Verschuren (1990), an earlier study in this tradition, found that the introduction of the cooperation procedure in the mid-1980s with the ratification of the Single European Act (SEA) had a positive effect on the swiftness of decision-making by increasing the use of qualified majority voting (QMV) instead of unanimity in the Council.…”
Section: Winning Coalitions and The Analysis Of Decision Efficiencysupporting
confidence: 56%
“…With every new treaty since then (Maastricht Treaty 1993, Amsterdam Treaty 1999, Nice Treaty 2003, and Lisbon Treaty 2009, the EU brought more policy domains into the remit of qualified majority voting, making that the standard principle of present-day decision-making. Research demonstrates that this change in the decision rule had a clear positive effect on decision-making efficiency in the EU (Golub 1999;Schulz and König 2000;Golub and Steunenberg 2007). However, during the same time period, the EU's membership more than tripled, from 9 in 1980 to 28 in 2013.…”
Section: Longitudinal Analysismentioning
confidence: 96%
“…While the third component of institutional friction, preference heterogeneity, remained relatively constant, a development exogenous to our measure of institutional friction -the growing involvement of the European Parliament in EU policy-makingis known to have affected decision-making capacity in a negative direction as well (Golub 1999;Golub and Steunenberg 2007;Schulz and König 2000). We use the Maastricht Treaty as cut-off point in Table 5, but given the gradual nature of these changes, we also repeated the analysis with the other treaties as cut-off points.…”
Section: Longitudinal Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After an early study by Krislov et al (1986) providing descriptive statistics on 472 EU decisions made between 1958 and 1981, Heiner Schulz and I introduced a theoretical model to derive hypotheses on institutional and preference-related factors influencing decision-making speed, i.e. on the application of qualified majority voting in the Council, on the participation of the European Parliament as an additional veto player, on the relevance of EU core policy areas as well as on the type of applied policy instrument (König and Schulz, 1997;Schulz and König, 2000). Using a data set on 5183 Commission proposals, which were processed in the period between 1984 and 1995, we tested these factors by applying both parametric and non-parametric event history analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%