Institutional Pressures and Environmental Management Practices: The Moderating Effects of Environmental Commitment and Resource Availability

Abstract

With the deterioration of the environment and the shortage of natural resources, firms are facing increasing pressures to implement environmental management practices in their daily operation management. Drawing on institutional theory and environmental management literatures, this research tries to explore how institutional pressures motivate firms to implement environmental management practices, and how such effects are moderated by firms' environmental commitment and resource availability. The results of a survey of 188 Chinese firms suggest that regulatory pressures and normative pressures are positively and significantly related to firms' propensity to implement environmental management practices. Moreover, the results indicate that firms' environmental commitment positively moderates the relationships between institutional pressures and environmental management practices, while firms' resource availability plays different roles depending on the types of pressure (regulatory or normative pressures). Implications and suggestions for future research are provided.Hypothesis 4. Greater resource availability strengthens the relationships between institutional pressures (regulatory and normative pressures) and environmental management practices.Based on the above analysis, the research framework is depicted in Figure 1. 56S. Wang et al.

Corporate voluntary greenhouse gas reporting: Stakeholder pressure and the mediating role of the chief executive officer

“…The pressure might also be as a result of contractual obligations restricting a firm to act in a particular pattern. Shahab et al () and Wang, Jun, and Dingtao () noted that the state's ability to impose its will upon organisations through the use of sanctions is a primary regulatory mechanism of control and one that can induce conformity. Normative forces are those pressures emerging from professional standards or a professional community within the network of the organisation.…”

The direct and moderating effects of power distance on carbon transparency: An international investigation of cultural value and corporate social responsibility

“…Many studies on CSR examine the determinants that affect companies' commitment to environmental preservation (Carballo‐Penela & Castromán‐Diz, ; Caritte, Acha, & Shah, ; Glass, Cook, & Ingersoll, ; Habib & Bhuiyan, ; S. Wang, Li, & Zhao, ; Yu, Lo, & Li, ) and to social and environmental disclosure (D'Amico, Coluccia, Fontana, & Solimene, ; Galbreath, ; Gallego‐Alvarez, Ortas, Vicente‐Villardón, & Álvarez Etxeberria, ; Helfaya & Moussa, ; Jizi, ; Lokuwaduge & Heenetigala, ). Because carbon disclosure is voluntary, the reliability of CSR disclosure is a concern (Datt, Luo, & Tang, ; Datt, Luo, Tang, & Mallik, ; Luo & Tang, ).…”

Developed market or developing market?: A perspective of institutional theory on multinational enterprises’ diversification and sustainable development with environmental protection

“…Fourth, this study should contribute to a general approach to study firms' performance in EP based on institutional theory. Previous studies demonstrate that firms' institutional environment influences their behavior and performance in EP (Chang, Li, & Lu, 2015;Wang, Li, & Zhao, 2017). Some of these used data with measures of board country-level institutions (Dögl & Behnam, 2015;Gallego-Alvarez et al, 2017), while others consider firm-specific institutional environments (Chang et al, 2015), such as regulative and normative pressures in China .…”