2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.intfin.2016.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional investment, equity volume and volatility spillover: Causalities and asymmetries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shahzad et al (2014) examine the volume–volatility relation by splitting volume into the number of trades and the average trade size at individual and institutional level, and find that the number of trades is the most important variable driving realized volatility. Chakraborty and Kakani (2016) show that volatility-led impact on volume is much bigger than the volume-led impact on volatility for equity markets in India, Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Shahzad et al (2014) examine the volume–volatility relation by splitting volume into the number of trades and the average trade size at individual and institutional level, and find that the number of trades is the most important variable driving realized volatility. Chakraborty and Kakani (2016) show that volatility-led impact on volume is much bigger than the volume-led impact on volatility for equity markets in India, Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Stock price volatility is the fluctuation of shares, the returns of a security or a portfolio in a certain period (Wang & Ma, 2014). Market volatility can occur due to new information entering the market or stock exchange (Chakraborty & Kakani, 2016). As a result, market players re-evaluate the assets traded by the company.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jones, 1994;Statman, Thorley and Vorkink, 2006;Chuang, Hsiang-His and Susmel, 2012). Others have used a multivariate GARCH model that simultaneously estimates the mean and conditional variance using returns (e.g., Henry and McKenzie, 2006;Chuang, Hsiang-His and Susmel, 2012;Chakraborty and Kakani, 2016). To obtain consistent and unbiased estimates, our study takes a different approach in that we examine the return-volume relation in the context of the IV approach.…”
Section: Dynamic Endogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A final word in this section is that there have been a few studies that empirically examine the endogenous volume‐return relationship in a vector autoregression specification where both variables are modeled together as endogenous (e.g., Hiemstra and Jones, ; Statman, Thorley and Vorkink, ; Chuang, Hsiang‐His and Susmel, ). Others have used a multivariate GARCH model that simultaneously estimates the mean and conditional variance using returns (e.g., Henry and McKenzie, ; Chuang, Hsiang‐His and Susmel, ; Chakraborty and Kakani, ). To obtain consistent and unbiased estimates, our study takes a different approach in that we examine the return‐volume relation in the context of the IV approach.…”
Section: Motivation: a Critical Review Of The Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%