Institutional design for improved forest governance through REDD: Lessons from the global environment facility

Rosendal, G. Kristin; Andresen, Steinar

doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.001

Cited by 37 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…If baseline-scenario thinking persists, Costa Rica would have very little to gain from REDD (Ebeling and Yasué, 2008). Moreover, a major bottleneck in adapting REDD+ to take account of biodiversity and sustainable forest management is the worldwide lack of good monitoring, verification and reporting mechanisms for biodiversity (Rosendal and Andresen, 2011).…”

Section: Redd+: Biodiversity and The Baseline Problemmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There is widespread concern that biodiversity has not been given adequate consideration in the REDD+ process, increasing the possibility of negative environmental impacts (Gardner et al, 2012;McDermott et al, 2012;O'Connor, 2008). At the international level, project monitoring and evaluation are currently geared to carbon levels and, it is argued, it will be difficult to achieve REDD+ without developing criteria and principles to evaluate the conservation and sustainabilitypromoting features of the projects (Rosendal and Andresen, 2011). As Kahle (2009) has shown, the income potential of countries with high biodiversity index values (i.e.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

How may REDD+ affect the practical, legal and institutional framework for ‘Payment for ecosystem services’ in Costa Rica?

Rosendal

Schei

2014

Ecosystem Services

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Redd+: Biodiversity and The Baseline Problemmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

How may REDD+ affect the practical, legal and institutional framework for ‘Payment for ecosystem services’ in Costa Rica?

Rosendal

Schei

2014

Ecosystem Services

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…This support is crucial because it mobilises funds for REDD+ without which interests in REDD+ could wane, especially in the context of alternative land uses (Clements, 2010, Rosendal andAndresen, 2011). Findings however reveal that this support is complicated by national institutional gaps and results in a negative vertical interplay in instituting REDD+ rules among multiple stakeholders.…”

Section: Stakeholder Engagement In Redd+ Implementation: Implicationsmentioning

confidence: 75%

Implementing REDD+ at the national level: Stakeholder engagement and policy coherences between REDD+ rules and Kenya's sectoral policies

Atela

Quinn

Minang

et al. 2016

Forest Policy and Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Effective implementation of rules on reduced emission from avoided deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) depends on the compatibility between these rules and existing sectoral policies associated with forests. This paper applies content analysis of policy documents, semi-structured interviews and case study analysis to examine the interplay between REDD+ rules and Kenyan sectorial policies and local socioeconomic

show abstract

“…(e.g. Corbera and Schroeder 2011; Thompson et al 2011;Visseren-Hamakers et al 2012a) approaches governance performance from a results rather than a legitimacy point of view (Rosendal and Andresen 2011). This study explores REDD?…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Legitimacy in REDD+ governance in Indonesia

Glover

Schroeder

2017

Int Environ Agreements

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper addresses the question of legitimacy in REDD? governance in Indonesia. It develops a legitimacy framework that builds on elements of Scharpf (J Eur Pub Policy 4(1):18-36, 1997) input and output legitimacy concept and the political economy lens described by Brockhaus and Angelsen (Analysing REDD?: Challenges and choices, CIFOR, Bogor, 2012). Using data collected through key informant interviews and focus groups, we identify and explore stakeholder perceptions of legitimacy. The analysis reveals a complex interplay between input and output legitimacy, finding that state, nonstate and hybrid actors perceive output legitimacy (i.e. project outcomes) as highly dependent on the level of input legitimacy achieved during the governance process. Nonstate actors perceive proxies for input legitimacy, such as participation and inclusion of local people, as goals in themselves. In the main, they perceive inclusion to be integral to the empowerment of local people. They perceive output legitimacy as less important because of the intangibility of REDD? outcomes at this stage in the process. The findings also highlight the challenges associated with measuring the legitimacy of REDD? governance in Indonesia.

show abstract

Institutional design for improved forest governance through REDD: Lessons from the global environment facility

Cited by 37 publications

References 16 publications

How may REDD+ affect the practical, legal and institutional framework for ‘Payment for ecosystem services’ in Costa Rica?

How may REDD+ affect the practical, legal and institutional framework for ‘Payment for ecosystem services’ in Costa Rica?

Implementing REDD+ at the national level: Stakeholder engagement and policy coherences between REDD+ rules and Kenya's sectoral policies

Legitimacy in REDD+ governance in Indonesia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About