Instant coffee consumption may be associated with higher risk of metabolic syndrome in Korean adults

Kim, Hyo Jin; Cho, Seongbeom; Jacobs, David R.; Park, Kyong

doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2014.07.007

Cited by 75 publications

(61 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Kim et al found that coffee consumption may increase the risk of metabolic syndrome in the Korean population because the study mainly focused on the consumption of the instant coffee that is usually high in sugar content. [11] On the other hand, our results demonstrated a negative correlation between the degree of coffee intake and metabolic syndrome in women. We present the following hypothesis as the plausible explanation for this discrepancy: the study population of our research is focused on women.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 51%

“…Some studies conducted in Japan have observed that high coffee intake may lower the risk of metabolic syndrome, [4–6] while other studies demonstrated that the consumption of the instant coffee may increase the risk of metabolic syndrome. [11] Furthermore, little is known about the direct association between coffee consumption and insulin resistance.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Association between the Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome and the Level of Coffee Consumption among Korean Women

Kim

Park

2016

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundAs coffee consumption is increasing remarkably over the past decade, the health effects concerning the coffee drinking has gained a wide attention across the nation. However, there is not a true consensus regarding the effects of coffee on metabolic disease. Therefore, this study aims to examine the association between coffee intake and the risk of metabolic syndrome in Korean womenMethodsWe used publicly accessible datasets collected through Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). Among 20,435 individuals from five consecutive years’ worth of data from 2007 to 2011, only 15,691 subjects qualified for statistical analysis upon applying the exclusion criteria. We carried out the statistical analysis utilizing SPSS Statistics version 13.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY.) and STATA statistical software release 13.0 (STATA Corp., College Station, TX).ResultsWe found that the frequency of coffee intake inversely correlates with the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in women. Upon adjusting for life-style factors, socioeconomic status, and nutritional profile, the subjects from the highest coffee consumption quartile exhibited 40% lower odds of suffering from metabolic syndrome compared to those in the control (OR = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.67–0.84; P for trend < 0.001). Also, we observed that age- and BMI-adjusted HOMA-IR decreased as the coffee consumption increased (P for trend < 0.001).ConclusionThe findings of our study suggest that coffee consumption might be associated with reduction of metabolic syndrome in Korean women. To elucidate this cross-sectional association between coffee consumption and metabolic syndrome in women, cohort studies are warranted to confirm this relationship.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 51%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Association between the Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome and the Level of Coffee Consumption among Korean Women

Kim

Park

2016

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although some studies have shown an adverse effect on the risk of metabolic syndrome, this has only been shown, for example, for higher coffee consumption (>3 cups/day), particularly of instant coffees with excess sugar and powdered creamer (Kim and others ), and therefore these results must be interpreted with caution.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comprehensive Overview of the Risks and Benefits of Coffee Consumption

Pourshahidi

Navarini

Petracco

et al. 2016

Comp Rev Food Sci Food Safe

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Findings on both the health benefits and the potentially harmful effects of coffee consumption have been contradictory. However, the general scientific consensus is that moderate, regular coffee drinking by healthy individuals is either essentially benign or mildly beneficial. Results and generalizations are complicated by a number of factors, including differences in age, gender, health status, type of coffee preparation, serving size, and source of coffee. Coffee may have potential health benefits and risks, but causality cannot be established for either with the research currently available as these are largely based on observational data. This review aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the risks and benefits of coffee consumption on health outcomes. A systematic search (search terms: "coffee" OR "coffee adj3" [consum * or intake * or drink * ]) of the literature (from 1970; humans; in English) using the electronic databases "OVID," "CINAHL," and "Web of Knowledge" returned 12405 results. Duplicates were removed, studies were screened (based on inclusion/exclusion criteria), and the remaining eligible studies (n = 1277) were used to collate an exhaustive list of the potential health benefits and risks of coffee consumption, which were grouped and are discussed with regard to major diseases/conditions (mortality, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and metabolic/liver/neurological disorders), atrisk/vulnerable groups, and specific coffee constituents. This qualitative assessment has shown that the health benefits (or null effects) clearly outweigh the risks of moderate coffee consumption in adult consumers for the majority of health outcomes considered. Results from this research may aid further qualitative and quantitative deterministic risk-benefit assessments of coffee consumption.

show abstract

“…A total of 13 studies of coffee consumption and risk of MetS were identified, two of which reported RRs > 1 and 95% CIs that did not overlap 1.0 [35,38]. One study [37] reported an RR > 1 with 95% CI that did overlap 1.0, while six studies [23][24][25][26]36,39] reported RRs < 1 and 95% CIs not overlapping 1.0.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 96%

“…In all, 41 full-text articles were reviewed, with 30 articles excluded because: one was a review; one had duplicate data; and 28 had no reported RRs or 95% CIs for the relationship between coffee intake and MetS. Finally, 11 published articles [23][24][25][26][27][28][35][36][37][38][39], including 13 studies with a total of 159,805 participants, were identified as eligible for the present meta-analysis of the relationship between coffee consumption with MetS risk. Of these, two articles [37,39] included two studies each; four studies were cohort studies with a total of 106,855 participants; eight studies were cross-sectional studies with 52,700 participants; and one was a case-control study with 250 participants.…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%