2009
DOI: 10.1117/12.833419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inspection of 32nm imprinted patterns with an advanced e-beam inspection system

Abstract: We used electron beam (e-beam) inspection (EBI) systems to inspect nano imprint lithography (NIL) resist wafers with programmed defects. EBI with 10nm pixel sizes has been demonstrated and capability of capturing program defects sized as small as 4nm has been proven. Repeating defects have been captured by the EBI in multiple die inspections to identify the possible mask defects. This study demonstrated the feasibility of EBI as the NIL defect inspection solution of 32nm and beyond.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Long scan times are the main challenge that these systems must overcome to supplant optical inspection as the workhorse physical defect detection tools in volume manufacturing, although it should also be noted that EBI will not be sensitive to certain buried defect types such as oxide voids. Published pixel throughputs for commercially available systems cap out at 400 MHz 13 with defect-to-pixel size ratios commonly around 1:1 for complete capture of physical defects 14 . These equipment parameters projects to a physical defect scan rate on present systems of 11.3 cm 2 per hour (53.1 hours per 600 cm 2 wafer) for a 28nm defect, almost 2 orders of magnitude below the specification of 1000 cm 2 per hour.…”
Section: Disruptive Technologies -Electron Beam Inspectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Long scan times are the main challenge that these systems must overcome to supplant optical inspection as the workhorse physical defect detection tools in volume manufacturing, although it should also be noted that EBI will not be sensitive to certain buried defect types such as oxide voids. Published pixel throughputs for commercially available systems cap out at 400 MHz 13 with defect-to-pixel size ratios commonly around 1:1 for complete capture of physical defects 14 . These equipment parameters projects to a physical defect scan rate on present systems of 11.3 cm 2 per hour (53.1 hours per 600 cm 2 wafer) for a 28nm defect, almost 2 orders of magnitude below the specification of 1000 cm 2 per hour.…”
Section: Disruptive Technologies -Electron Beam Inspectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relatively low speed EBI equipment is commonly in use, principally in the detection of voltage contrast defects 11,12 . Long scan times are the main challenge that these systems must overcome to supplant optical inspection as the workhorse physical defect detection tools in volume manufacturing, although it should also be noted that EBI will not be sensitive to certain buried defect types such as oxide voids.…”
Section: Disruptive Technologies -Electron Beam Inspectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also studied the capability of EBI capturing of program defects on 32nm nano imprint resist patterns. [4], [5]. We studied the CD variation before and after EBI in 65nm PR pattern, which showed less than 3% shrinkage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%