2021
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202109252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights into the Structure and Self‐Assembly of Organic‐Semiconductor/Quantum‐Dot Blends

Abstract: Controlling the dispersibility of crystalline inorganic quantum dots (QD) within organic-QD nanocomposite films is critical for a wide range of optoelectronic devices. A promising way to control nanoscale structure in these nanocomposites is via the use of appropriate organic ligands on the QD, which help to compatibilize them with the organic host, both electronically and structurally. Here, using combined small-angle X-ray and neutron scattering, the authors demonstrate and quantify the incorporation of such… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
16
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The measured virial coefficients are remarkably consistent with this simple model with a fixed solvent-ligand shell thickness t shell = 2.03 ± 0.15 nm, i.e., NCs with an effective thermodynamic diameter of D thermo = D core + 4.06 nm. This shell thickness is approximately equal to the sum of the oleate ligand shell thickness, as measured using small-angle neutron scattering (1.5-1.6 nm), 36,37 and one intermolecular spacing in liquid toluene, consistent with its density and neutron scattering analysis (0.6 nm). 38 The observed size dependence contrasts with the non-monotonic trends in B 2 found in earlier studies that necessitated the consideration of more complex inter-NC potentials with competing attractive and repulsive interactions and multiple fit parameters.…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The measured virial coefficients are remarkably consistent with this simple model with a fixed solvent-ligand shell thickness t shell = 2.03 ± 0.15 nm, i.e., NCs with an effective thermodynamic diameter of D thermo = D core + 4.06 nm. This shell thickness is approximately equal to the sum of the oleate ligand shell thickness, as measured using small-angle neutron scattering (1.5-1.6 nm), 36,37 and one intermolecular spacing in liquid toluene, consistent with its density and neutron scattering analysis (0.6 nm). 38 The observed size dependence contrasts with the non-monotonic trends in B 2 found in earlier studies that necessitated the consideration of more complex inter-NC potentials with competing attractive and repulsive interactions and multiple fit parameters.…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
“…Per our results, this effective shell thickness is approximately equal to the solvent-swollen oleate ligand shell thickness, as measured using small-angle neutron scattering (1.5−1.6 nm). 44,45 The observed size dependence contrasts with the nonmonotonic trends in B 2 found in earlier studies that necessitated the consideration of more complex inter-NC potentials with competing attractive and repulsive interactions and multiple fit parameters. 11,12 Likewise, attractive square-well and sticky-sphere potentials have been required to model SAXS and neutron scattering results to extract the B 2 and effective ligand shell thickness for materials whose interactions exhibit similar complexities.…”
contrasting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A successful surface chemistry approach for achieving good QD dispersibility within a host material has been through ligand exchange approaches utilizing ligands that are chemically similar to the host material. This has been demonstrated in QD:polymer, QD:perovskite, and QD:organic semiconductor (OSC) materials. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the resultant PbS-TET-CA dots have a surface character intermediate between OA and TET-CA and this has proved to be an important factor in their self-assembly. 18 Grazing incidence small-angle X-ray scattering (GISAXS) has been extensively utilized to study QD superlattices, where QDs form highly ordered crystalline thin films, demonstrating the power of X-ray scattering for characterizing QD morphologies. [19][20][21][22] For photon multiplier thin films, requiring intimate contact between the OSC and QDs, the optimal structure is one of highly dispersed, separated (by distances on the order of the exciton diffusion length) QDs within a crystalline matrix of the OSC (as opposed to the highly ordered crystalline QD morphologies features reported in QD superlattices).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%