2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights into the pore structure and implications for fluid flow capacity of tight gas sandstone: A case study in the upper paleozoic of the Ordos Basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The volume, connectivity, and PSD of sandstone reservoirs can be reflected by the inversion of NMR T 2 results [19,42,43]. In general, a long relaxation time corresponds to large pores, while a short relaxation time corresponds to small pores [5]. On the one hand, the PSD curves derived from the NMR of type I reservoirs predominantly ranged from 0.01 to 10 μm, and the peak value of the pore size varied in the range 0.1-2 μm (Figure 7).…”
Section: Nmr Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The volume, connectivity, and PSD of sandstone reservoirs can be reflected by the inversion of NMR T 2 results [19,42,43]. In general, a long relaxation time corresponds to large pores, while a short relaxation time corresponds to small pores [5]. On the one hand, the PSD curves derived from the NMR of type I reservoirs predominantly ranged from 0.01 to 10 μm, and the peak value of the pore size varied in the range 0.1-2 μm (Figure 7).…”
Section: Nmr Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with conventional oil and gas resources, they are characterized by poor stability, strong heterogeneity, and a complex oilwater interaction mechanism, and are also very difficult to evaluate and explore [3]. Additionally, tight sandstone reservoirs represent one of the important tight oil and gas resources, and a clear understanding of their pore structure is the basis for the study of tight oil and gas accumulation, the associated charging mechanism, and the resource potential [4][5][6][7]. However, their strong heterogeneity as well as their substantial number of nanoscale pore throats make the characterization of their pore structure difficult [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main types of pores developed in different sedimentary facies are diverse, and the pore throat configuration relationship is different. Due to the attachment and blockage of clay minerals, various types of pores will form a seepage network with various structures, which has a direct impact on the mobility of the occurrence fluid. Previous studies have often neglected the influence of pore types on movable fluids, some studies simply set a T 2 spectrum value in the NMR pore distribution to represent the boundary of different types of pores, , but most of the pore sizes of different types have crossed. Cast thin sections and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) methods can more accurately measure the distribution characteristics of different types of pores, , but the experimental results have difficulty in establishing a relationship with the pore parameters obtained by NMR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether San Juan, Alberta, Uinta, Piceance, Green River basins in North America, or Ordos, Sichuan, Songliao, Tarim basins in China, a series of important breakthroughs have been made in the research and exploration of tight gas (Andra´s et al, 2012;Dai et al, 2019;Law and Curtis, 2002;Li et al, 2012;Masters, 1979;Shanley et al, 2004;Sun et al, 2019;Zhao et al, 2019;Zou et al, 2015). However, with the deepened of tight gas exploration and development, the problems of formation water output of tight sandstone with low porosity and permeability, strong heterogeneity, nanoscale pores and high water saturation have gradually emerged (Clarkson et al, 2012;Lai et al, 2018;Nie et al, 2021;Qiao et al, 2020). For example, the water/gas ratio of tight sandstone gas reservoirs in the Piceance Basin in the United States exceeds 1.2m 3 /10 4 m 3 , and the proportion of producing wells reaches 27.2% (Wei et al, 2017); the water/gas ratio of the Upper Paleozoic in the western Ordos Basin in China exceeds 1m 3 / 10 4 m 3 (Zhou et al, 2016); and the daily water production of some wells exceeds 100 m 3 (Wu et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accumulation theory of "broad and gentle slope structure, extensive hydrocarbon generation, large area charging, micro-nanometer pore features, coupled transport between pores and fractures, and near migration and accumulation" effectively guided the early exploration of tight gas (Fu et al, 2013;Nelson, 2009;Qiao et al, 2020;Schmitt et al, 2015;Xu et al, 2012;Yang et al, 2008Yang et al, , 2012Zhao et al, 2012;Zou et al, 2012), but the complex distribution of gas and water in tight sandstone is beyond the reach. With the improvement of geological theory and the increase of exploration degree, the condition of source rock is considered to be an important aspect to control the formation of tight sandstone gas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%