2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b02366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights into Efficient Removal of Gaseous Hg0 using AgIO3-Modified BiOI/CoFe2O4 Composites through Photocatalytic Oxidation

Abstract: A series of AgIO3 modified BiOI/CoFe2O4 heterojunction photocatalysts synthesized by a solvothermal and subsequent deposition–precipitation method were utilized to remove gaseous Hg0 from simulated flue gas under fluorescent light irradiation. The effects of AgIO3 content, photocatalyst dosage, solution temperature, fluorescent lamp irradiation, pH value, inorganic anions, and SO2 and NO on Hg0 removal performances were investigated in detail. Moreover, the ternary AgIO3–BiOI/CoFe2O4 composites were characteri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(115 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where X is photocatalyst electronegativity (6.71 eV for AgIO 3 ) and E c is the energy of free electrons on the hydrogen scale (4.44 eV), respectively. 27 Consequently, the E CB and E VB for AgIO 3 are estimated to be 0.66 and 3.88 eV, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where X is photocatalyst electronegativity (6.71 eV for AgIO 3 ) and E c is the energy of free electrons on the hydrogen scale (4.44 eV), respectively. 27 Consequently, the E CB and E VB for AgIO 3 are estimated to be 0.66 and 3.88 eV, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of the band gap ( E g ) of AgIO 3 was calculated by the virtue of the classical Tauc method to be 3.22 eV (Figure S5). Moreover, the following empirical equation can be used to determine the conduction band (CB) position ( E CB ) and the valence band (VB) position ( E VB ) for semiconductor photocatalysts: E CB = X – E c – 0.5 E g , E VB = E CB + E g , where X is photocatalyst electronegativity (6.71 eV for AgIO 3 ) and E c is the energy of free electrons on the hydrogen scale (4.44 eV), respectively . Consequently, the E CB and E VB for AgIO 3 are estimated to be 0.66 and 3.88 eV, respectively.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhou et al [193] studied ternary magnetic Ag 2 WO 4 /BiOI/CoFe 2 O 4 hybrid compounds, evaluating their photocatalytic activity towards toxic elemental mercury Hg(0) removal. In addition, BiOI/CoFe 2 O 4 composites modified with AgIO 3 [194] and Ag 2 CO 3 [195] were found to be highly efficient in the photocatalytic reduction of Hg(0).…”
Section: Eco-friendly Materials Used To Treat "Model Pollutants"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mercury (Hg), a typical heavy metal with hypertoxicity, volatility, persistence, and bioaccumulation, has attracted much attention in recent years. , The source of Hg can be divided into natural sources including volcano eruption and forest fires, anthropogenic sources including coal combustion for industrial or domestic utilization, as well as Hg reemission from natural surfaces. , Among different anthropogenic Hg sources, coal combustion in power plants is a major source. As shown in Figure , during the process of coal combustion, almost all the Hg in coal will release and enter into the flue gas in the form of Hg 0 . With the cooling of the flue gas, a part of Hg 0 undergoes a series of homogeneous and heterogeneous reactions to transform into the oxidized Hg (Hg 2+ ), and some of the Hg 2+ adsorbs on the surface of fly ash to transform into the particulate-associated Hg (Hg p ), which mainly refers to HgCl 2 , HgO, HgSO 4 , and HgS. , The content of Hg in fly ash can be measured using a specific Hg analyzer. , The identification of Hg species in fly ash can be accomplished by the method of H 2 -TPD through classifying the decomposition peaks against temperature. Hg species identified and corresponding temperature ranges are HgCl 2 (134–142 °C) < HgS (293–317 °C) < HgO (277–476 °C) < HgSO 4 (575–591 °C) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%