2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insider ownership, ownership concentration and investment performance: An international comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
50
1
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
5
50
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…LOGAT was used as a control variable, displaying a negative sign, corroborating the results of Gugler et al (2008) and Caixe & Krauter (2013), who state that a company's size impacts negatively in its market value, pointing out that large corporations are subject to greater agency problems and, consequently, higher monitoring costs, which reduce their performance. As for Net Profit, the positive sign was expected, given that an increase in it points out, as a first indicative, a maximization of the company's results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…LOGAT was used as a control variable, displaying a negative sign, corroborating the results of Gugler et al (2008) and Caixe & Krauter (2013), who state that a company's size impacts negatively in its market value, pointing out that large corporations are subject to greater agency problems and, consequently, higher monitoring costs, which reduce their performance. As for Net Profit, the positive sign was expected, given that an increase in it points out, as a first indicative, a maximization of the company's results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Similarly, [24] in their study of UK firms, and [25] in his study of firms in Switzerland find that insider ownership has a positive relationship with firm performance. However, a study by [26] finds that insider ownership has an unambiguous negative effect on firm performance while [27] indicates that insider ownership boost risk taking strategies among managers.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The results of studies such as those by Claessens, Djankov, Fan, and Lang (2002), Gugler, Mueller, and Yurtoglu (2008), Fahlenbrach and Stulz (2009) and Gárcia-Meca and Sánchez-Ballesta (2011) suggest that there is a relationship between ownership structure and corporate performance. However, other studies, such as those by Demsetz and Lehn (1985), Himmelberg, Hubbard, and Palia (1999) and Demsetz and Villalonga (2001), conclude that the ownership and control structure is an endogenous variable that is determined by corporate characteristics and does not influence company performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%