Inside co‐production: Ruling, resistance, and practice

Bevir, Mark; Needham, Catherine; Waring, Justin

doi:10.1111/spol.12483

Cited by 47 publications

(34 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, the work of the United Kingdom government's Department for International Development includes the use of embedded evaluation (DFID, 2013). 1 Embedded evaluation also links with other approaches including real time evaluation where evaluation takes place alongside the delivery of an intervention and contributes to operational change (Jamal & Crisp, 2002); realist evaluation, which highlights the importance of context and individual responses (Pawson & Tilley, 1997); and co‐production based approaches, where participants are involved in the design and delivery of social policy interventions (Bevir, Needham, & Waring, 2019; Crompton, 2019; Richardson & Durose, 2016).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Social policy and embedded evaluation: Assessing the impact of a food insecurity project in the United Kingdom

Purdam

Silver

2020

Soc Policy Adm

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Social policy and embedded evaluation: Assessing the impact of a food insecurity project in the United Kingdom

Purdam

Silver

2020

Soc Policy Adm

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For Cahn (2000) timebanking rests upon four core principles: treating people as assets, re-defining work, reciprocity and social capital. Based upon these values, timebanking is a mechanism for facilitating co-production of welfare services: a term that has gained popularity within policy debates (Needham, 2008; Bovaird et al , 2015; Durose et al , 2017; Bevir et al , 2019). Co-production seeks to change the relationship between service user and provider towards one of greater partnership, building a new social network to foster the growth of social capital.…”

Section: Timebanking: An Overviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pride and Purpose: reflections on timebanking practice for fostering social networks in wellbeing improvement schemes

Lee

2020

J. Soc. Pol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper explores the relationship between social capital and a community initiative known as timebanking. Its purpose is to offer a more critical account of the literature to date, which suggests timebanking generates improved health outcomes because it facilitates bridging social capital. Drawing on Cattell’s (2011) analysis of social networks the paper offers an alternative account. It suggests a more nuanced view of social networks shows the development of different networks by members, resulting from gendered forms of participation. The consequences of this is that whilst different network forms provide sources of pride and coping mechanisms for members, for women they inhabit more diverse networks which offer greater benefits whilst men may still experience some forms of exclusion and isolation through their participation.

show abstract

“…A conceptual intersectionality is particularly notable in the ways that care and choice have been utilised as part of a patient empowerment or ‘service user emancipation’ strategy (Bevir et al . : 1), which holds considerable normative sway in health policy via calls for patient‐centred, shared or co‐produced care. Both within and beyond healthcare policy sociologists have found heterogeneous understandings and practices of care and choice.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The convivial and the pastoral in patient–doctor relationships: a multi‐country study of patient stories of care, choice and medical authority in cancer diagnostic processes

MacArtney

Andersen

Malmström

et al. 2020

Sociology Health & Illness

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Experiences of cancer diagnosis are changing in light of both the increasingly technological-clinical diagnostic processes and the socio-political context in which interpersonal relations take place. This has raised questions about how we might understand patient-doctor relationship marked by asymmetries of knowledge and social capital, but that emphasise patients' empowered choices and individualised care. As part of an interview study of 155 participants with bowel or lung cancer across Denmark, England and Sweden, we explored participants' stories of the decisions made during their cancer diagnostic process. By focusing on the intersections of care, choice and medical authoritya convivial pastoral dynamic we provide a conceptual analysis of the normative ambivalences in people's stories of their cancer diagnosis. We found that participants drew from care, choice and medical authority to emphasise their relationality and interdependence with their doctors in their stories of their diagnosis. Importantly negotiations of an asymmetrical patient-doctor relationship were part of an on-going realisation of the healthcare processes as a human endeavour. We were therefore able to draw attention to the limitations of dichotomising emancipatory-empowerment discourses and argue for a theorisation of the patient-doctor relationship as a contextually bounded and relationally ambivalent humanity. Notes1 The authors recognise the potential rupture of using conviviality outside of the studies of race and racism studies and considered developing alternative conceptualisations. However, it was felt this would be both academically inappropriate and an injustice to the inspiration and work of those cited as well as the wider field of cultural studies from which it was drawn.

show abstract

Inside co‐production: Ruling, resistance, and practice

Cited by 47 publications

References 31 publications

Social policy and embedded evaluation: Assessing the impact of a food insecurity project in the United Kingdom

Social policy and embedded evaluation: Assessing the impact of a food insecurity project in the United Kingdom

Pride and Purpose: reflections on timebanking practice for fostering social networks in wellbeing improvement schemes

The convivial and the pastoral in patient–doctor relationships: a multi‐country study of patient stories of care, choice and medical authority in cancer diagnostic processes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About