2011
DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.82.6.815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

InSAR and Optical Constraints on Fault Slip during the 2010-2011 New Zealand Earthquake Sequence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1) (Ristau 2008;Sibson et al 2011), consistent with slip on either a northÁnorthwestÁ southÁsoutheast-striking or eastÁnortheastÁwestÁsouth-west-striking fault plane. Results from separate geodetic and strong motion inversions indicate that two distinct patches of slip occurred either on intersecting fault planes or on a single fault oriented northÁnorthwestÁsouthÁsoutheast; the former interpretation is preferred by Beavan et al (2012), while a single fault plane with an eastÁnortheastÁwestÁsouthwest orientation was preferred by Barnhart et al (2011). The 13 June earthquakes were immediately followed by aftershock activity extending towards Port Levy and Pigeon Bay, along a distinct northÁnorthwestÁsouthÁsoutheast trend (Fig.…”
Section: Aftershocks Between February and June 2011mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…1) (Ristau 2008;Sibson et al 2011), consistent with slip on either a northÁnorthwestÁ southÁsoutheast-striking or eastÁnortheastÁwestÁsouth-west-striking fault plane. Results from separate geodetic and strong motion inversions indicate that two distinct patches of slip occurred either on intersecting fault planes or on a single fault oriented northÁnorthwestÁsouthÁsoutheast; the former interpretation is preferred by Beavan et al (2012), while a single fault plane with an eastÁnortheastÁwestÁsouthwest orientation was preferred by Barnhart et al (2011). The 13 June earthquakes were immediately followed by aftershock activity extending towards Port Levy and Pigeon Bay, along a distinct northÁnorthwestÁsouthÁsoutheast trend (Fig.…”
Section: Aftershocks Between February and June 2011mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…1,2). SPC techniques are commonly applied to constrain co-seismic rupture displacements (e.g., Michel et al, 1999;Dominguez et al, 2003;Avouac et al, 2006;Leprince et al, 2008;Oskin et al, 2012), glacial surface velocities (e.g., Scambos et al, 1992;Kääb, 2002;Berthier et al, 2005;Stearns et al, 2005;Debella-Gilo and Kääb, 2011;Willis et al, 2012;Melkonian et al, 2013), and landslide motions (e.g., Kääb, 2002;Delacourt et al, 2004). Use of high-resolution commercial images in such studies are advantageous for several reasons: increased spatial resolution over imagery such as Landsat-8, increased temporal resolution because of the ability to direct satellite viewing geometries, and the ability to analyze imagery from multiple sensors (e.g., Barnhart et al, 2011).…”
Section: Worldview2 Sub-pixel Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S2). We implement a Monte Carlo error propagation approach (Barnhart et al, 2011) wherein we generate 1000 synthetic noisy data sets by adding Gaussian distributed random noise to the predicted displacements from our best SDs. All observations and corresponding Green's functions are preweighted by the Cholesky inverse of the noise covariance matrix ; thus, the spatially correlated nature of the InSAR noise and the nonspatially correlated nature of the GPS noise are both accounted for when Gaussian noise is added.…”
Section: Finite-fault Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%