2001
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0475.00045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Input Demand and the Shortand Long-Run Employment Thresholds: An Empirical Analysis for the German Manufacturing Sector

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…37,38 Table 5 summarizes the main results for the adjustment coefficient and elasticities of the several models in this study. As mentioned already, the values are in line with previous studies for Germany such as Addison and Teixeira (2005), Bellmann and Pahnke (2006), Bohachova et al (2011), Breitung (1992), Buch and Lipponer (2010), Flaig and Rottmann (2001), Flaig and Steiner (1989), Franz and König (1986), Fuchs (2010), Koellreuter (1980), Kölling (1998), Pfeiffer (1999) as well as Rottmann and Ruschinski (1998). These studies differ in database, observation period, observed regions, analyzed sectors, estimation approaches and the specification of adjustment costs.…”
Section: Tablesupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…37,38 Table 5 summarizes the main results for the adjustment coefficient and elasticities of the several models in this study. As mentioned already, the values are in line with previous studies for Germany such as Addison and Teixeira (2005), Bellmann and Pahnke (2006), Bohachova et al (2011), Breitung (1992), Buch and Lipponer (2010), Flaig and Rottmann (2001), Flaig and Steiner (1989), Franz and König (1986), Fuchs (2010), Koellreuter (1980), Kölling (1998), Pfeiffer (1999) as well as Rottmann and Ruschinski (1998). These studies differ in database, observation period, observed regions, analyzed sectors, estimation approaches and the specification of adjustment costs.…”
Section: Tablesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Both estimations indicate fixed and convex, asymmetric adjustment costs. Furthermore, the elasticities for turnover and wage in the production sector are in line with Flaig and Rottmann (2001) as well as Pfeiffer (1999). 38 The functional form of firms' adjustment costs varies with plant size.…”
Section: Tablesupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Imported and domestic materials as well as purchased services benefit more from output growth than the different skill types of labour. The output elasticities of the different skill levels range between 0.38 for medium-skilled workers and 0.53 for highly skilled workers, while the output elasticities of imported Flaig and Rottmann (2001) and Koebel et al (2000) using a similar data set. 11 The low output elasticities of labour demand can be interpreted as evidence of ''jobless growth'', indicating that output growth must be substantial in order to create jobs, given the negative effects of a wage increase and laboursaving technological change on unskilled labour.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…using a similar data set. 11 The low output elasticities of labour demands can be interpreted as evidence for "jobless growth", pointing out that output growth must be substantial in order to create jobs, given the negative effects of wage increase and labour-saving technological change for unskilled labour.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%