2018
DOI: 10.1111/ppa.12843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inoculum potential of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum sclerotia depends on isolate and host plant

Abstract: The soilborne fungus Sclerotinia sclerotiorum infects many important crop plants. Central to the success of this pathogen is the production of sclerotia, which enables survival in soil and constitutes the primary inoculum. This study aimed to determine how crop plant type and S. sclerotiorum isolate impact sclerotial production and germination and hence inoculum potential. Three S. sclerotiorum isolates (L6, L17, L44) were used to inoculate plants of bean, carrot, lettuce, oilseed rape (OSR) and potato, and th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The technical difficulty of estimating fruiting body numbers on a large quantity of debris has slowed down this research. Direct enumeration can be achieved for large sclerotia of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Taylor et al , ) but it becomes impractical for microsclerotes, such as those of Ramolispora sorghi (Brady et al , ). Similarly, some authors have been able to estimate perithecia of Mycosphaerella fijiensis on leaves (Burt et al , ) or pseudothecia of Leptosphaeria maculans on stubble (Lô‐Pelzer et al , ), but without automated phenotyping methods, the observation time and tediousness limit the number of samples that can be processed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technical difficulty of estimating fruiting body numbers on a large quantity of debris has slowed down this research. Direct enumeration can be achieved for large sclerotia of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Taylor et al , ) but it becomes impractical for microsclerotes, such as those of Ramolispora sorghi (Brady et al , ). Similarly, some authors have been able to estimate perithecia of Mycosphaerella fijiensis on leaves (Burt et al , ) or pseudothecia of Leptosphaeria maculans on stubble (Lô‐Pelzer et al , ), but without automated phenotyping methods, the observation time and tediousness limit the number of samples that can be processed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, contrary to the isolates 2 and 3, carpogenic germination of isolate 1 was completely inhibited at the concentration of 2.5 mg/L. It is reported that different isolates of S. sclerotiorum show a variety of reactions to ecological situations, non‐chemical and biocontrol agents (Wu & Subbarao, 2008; Ojaghian, 2011, Ojaghian et al, 2015, Ojaghian et al, 2016; Taylor et al., 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4). It is reported that different isolates of S. sclerotiorum show a variety of reactions to ecological situations, nonchemical, and biocontrol agents (Wu and Subbarao 2008;Ojaghian 2011;Ojaghian et al 2015Ojaghian et al , 2016bTaylor et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%