Innovative Technology–Based Interventions to Reduce Stigma Toward People With Mental Illness: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract

Background Stigma toward people with mental illness presents serious consequences for the impacted individuals, such as social exclusion and increased difficulties in the recovery process. Recently, several interventions have been developed to mitigate public stigma, based on the use of innovative technologies, such as virtual reality and video games. Objective This review aims to systematically review, synthesize, measure, and critically discuss experimental studies that measure the effect of technological interventions on stigmatization levels. Methods This systematic review and meta-analysis was based on PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines and included studies in English and Spanish published between 2016 and 2021. Searches were run in 5 different databases (ie, PubMed, PsycInfo, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ScienceDirect). Only randomized controlled trials were included. Two independent reviewers determined the eligibility, extracted data, and rated methodological quality of the studies. Meta-analyses were performed using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. Results Based on the 1158 articles screened, 72 articles were evaluated as full text, of which 9 were included in the qualitative and quantitative syntheses. A diversity of interventions was observed, including video games, audiovisual simulation of hallucinations, virtual reality, and electronic contact with mental health services users. The meta-analysis (n=1832 participants) demonstrated that these interventions had a consistent medium effect on reducing the level of public stigma (d=–0.64; 95% CI 0.31-0.96; P<.001). Conclusions Innovative interventions involving the use of technologies are an effective tool in stigma reduction, therefore new challenges are proposed and discussed for the demonstration of their adaptability to different contexts and countries, thus leading to their massification. Trial Registration PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42021261935; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021261935

Self-stigma in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 40 studies from 25 high- and low-to-middle income countries

“…It may be hypothesized that these countries may have disseminated public health policies to lower the public stigma of mental illness, or that social interventions to protect people with mental disabilities may reduce self-stigma experience in those countries [8]. It should be noted that we did not nd an obvious decrease in the level of stigma over time despite the implementation of As two recent meta-analyses have con rmed their effectiveness, web-based interventions should be promoted in countries with high internet access [70,71]. The evidence for the effectiveness of interventions aiming to reduce personal stigma was recently synthetized in a meta-analysis of 21 randomized clinical trials [72].…”

Mental health problems, health risk behaviors, and prevention: A qualitative interview study on perceptions and attitudes among elite male soccer players

“…Many proposals for preventive measures concerned individual external or confidential support, such as a psychologist. The internet was seen as a channel of support for players, as it is an easily accessible and anonymous way to get help, which according to previous studies lowers the threshold for addressing concerns or problems ( 51 ). In the light of this study and previous research, the support and prevention work among elite soccer players should be developed to more effectively promote health in this group ( 16 , 25 ).…”

Establishing a Care Continuum for Cardiometabolic Conditions for Patients with Serious Mental Illness

“…However, available studies may lack the rigor of a control arm, are of limited duration, or have not been linked to behavioral changes [94,95]. Studies have used anti-stigma educational training programs, increased contact with individuals with SMI (in-person, video), technology (e.g., virtual reality), and public activism approaches [95][96][97][98][99]. More rigorous studies targeting behavioral change are needed to elucidate mechanisms that both mediate stigma and promote change around caring for persons with SMI.…”