Innovative Potential in the Context of Determining the Innovative Activities Results of Industrial Enterprises

Abstract

The article deals with the state of the study of the essential characteristics determining problem, differentiation, criterion classification of the innovation activity results as the goals of its implementation and assessment markers of pragmatism involvement in innovation activity by individual subjects of the economy. For the purposes of the study, a low study level of the innovative activity results in the scientific literature interpretation in business and Ukrainian law-making practices and limited in the form of reducing their varieties to an innovative product as an intellectual law object and innovative products. Given the importance of influencing the innovation results formation in such specific economic categories of innovative science as innovation potential, innovation activity, innovation process, innovation infrastructure, innovation system and others, in this scientific research attention is paid to the feather. In order to find out the innovative potential essence in the context of its historical isolation into a separate category of economic potential and place of this type enterprise potential in the results formation of commercialization of scientific developments and utility models, marketing and management decisions, the morphological analysis of definitions of existing scientific terminology of the study potential was carried out. What is the purpose of analyzing and systematizing scientific approaches to determine the innovative potential essence, subsequently used to build understanding of its categorical apparatus and to compare the economic and innovation potentials concepts with the deduction of meaningful ordering structural elements markers and its relationship with the potential itself concept enabling to trace the primary

Innovative Potential of the Agrarian Sector of Ukraine: Forming and Efficiency of Realization

“…The experience of the main developed countries shows that now, in the era of the knowledge economy, the basic object of reproducibility in the economy is human capital, formed under conditions of the development of educational-scientific and socio-cultural processes, but limited by the individual capabilities and abilities. In this case, education ensures the quality of economic growth, and the history of civilization development does not include any example when a certain country became richer at the impoverished education, science, and culture [26]. According to the data from the World Bank, over 2000-2019, the share of scientists among the employed population increased, on average, in the EU-28 countries by 1.5 times, and in Bulgaria, Lithuania, Poland, Slovenia, and the Czech Republic -by more than 1.7 times (Table 2).…”