Innovative management in Russian production companies

Smirnov, V.V.; Semenov, V. V.; Zakharova, A.N.; Kadyshev, E. N.; Dulina, G.S.

doi:10.1088/1757-899x/483/1/012060

Cited by 8 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition to expanding the number of criteria, researchers and society carry out cross-country and inter-regional comparisons to assess the level of development. This is an objective trend born of the information revolution and globalization [17]. The relevance of this trend intensified research on the methodology of measurements and comparisons.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of the Level of Social Development in Russia

Смирнов¹,

Zakharova²,

Semenov³

et al. 2020

Proceedings of the International Session on Factors of Regional Extensive Development (FRED 2019)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article shows a retrospective of the problem of social development and presents various forms of perception of "living standards"; "individual and social welfare"; "basic needs", et el. At the same time, the leading criterion of social development is quality of life (living standards and well-being of the population) formulated by Aristotle. The government should ensure high quality of life, and the good is a means of living and well-being. The work identifies the stages of evolution of the concept of social development from the individual well-being (preferences) to the social one. The emphasis is on the need to take into account the regulatory and distribution principle which can have an ordering and leveling effect on the financial situation of certain groups of the population, mandatory satisfaction of basic minimum needs and improvement of public services, respect for human rights. The changes in the method for assessing the level of social development from the criterion of freedom of choice to the "Human Development Index" are analyzed. The changes in the approach to assessing social development are due to the fact that for highly developed countries material security and basic needs are secondary while in the developing countries they remained relevant. In addition to expanding the number of criteria, researchers and society pay attention to crosscountry comparisons to assess the development. The relevance of the study is due to the transition of assessing the level of social development from quantitative to qualitative indicators in accordance with the methodology of crosscountry comparison of the main indicators of the "Human Development Index". The article analyzes the transition from the general study of the level and quality of life, measuring their characteristics, analyzing the applicability of certain groups of indicators for international comparisons and assessing socioeconomic policies (International society for quality-of-life studies, ISQOLS; Organization for economic cooperation and development, OECD; International social survey program, ISSP and other) to the Human Development Index (Human Development Reports. United Nations development program)-a simple and informative picture of the state of society (ender-related development index, GDI; gender empowerment measure, GEM; income-distribution-adjusted index, IDAI; human poverty index, HPI and other). As a result of assessing the level of social development, it was revealed that Russia can reach either the level of "Above"

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of the Level of Social Development in Russia

Смирнов¹,

Zakharova²,

Semenov³

et al. 2020

Proceedings of the International Session on Factors of Regional Extensive Development (FRED 2019)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…DISCUSSION OF RESULTS The theoretical and methodological approach to the assessment and systematic analysis of the life position of the Russian regions allows us to supplement the basis of scientific knowledge of the economic nature of the region associated with the territorial development of production forces and production relations [21], status outlines of the diversity of interdisciplinary knowledge [22,23]: the physicogeographical structure of the region [24], economic [25,26], political and administrative [27], socio-cultural [28,29], political [30]. The proposed approach complements modern foreign research in the field of the theory and practice of quantitative spatial development [31][32][33][34], the formation of a competitive paradigm in spatial economics [35], as well as Russian studies on the innovative development of territories [36][37][38].…”

Section: IVmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of the Living Standards in the Russian Regions

Смирнов¹,

Zakharova²,

Semenov³

et al. 2020

Proceedings of the International Session on Factors of Regional Extensive Development (FRED 2019)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The research deals with theoretical and methodological knowledge for assessing the living standards of Russian regions, supplementing the basis of economic laws of the region and its spatial development. The subject is the living standards of the Russian regions based on the interdependent set of nonlinear equations showing the real state and possibilities of its activation. The aim is to conduct a systematic analysis of the living standards of the Russian regions, taking into account the corresponding non-linear equations, determine the group of leaders with active, passive, and negative positions, as well as possibilities of its activation. The research methodology is based on the fundamental principles of the theory and practice of system analysis, economic laws, the results of scientific research in the field of equilibrium and nonequilibrium economic development. As a result of the systematic analysis of the dynamics of socioeconomic indicators of the Russian regions based on the construction of an interdependent set of non-linear equations of the growth rate of the average annual population, the index of physical volume of investments in fixed assets, the industrial production index, the degree of depreciation of fixed assets, the share of unprofitable organizations, changes in the average annual number of employees, regions were identified. It is advisable to use the results in forming the state socioeconomic policy in order to activate the life position of the regions, improve the mechanism for its implementation. The essence of the life position of the Russian regions is considered as a system structure, capable of filling the region's life, adapting to new challenges and forming an adaptive variety of self-reproducing complexes and reproductive processes. The criterion for classifying a region as a specific form of life position is the equilibrium paradigm realized through a combination of nonlinear equations of growth rates of basic socioeconomic indicators.

show abstract

“…The implementation of a systematic approach in the SSUSES methodology is reduced to the territorial entity examination on the developing its emergent and synergistic qualities possibility, to identification of the diverse links and mechanisms that ensure these qualities in a dynamic system. The essence of the systematic approach implementation to the SSUSES ensuring process can be described using the structure of indicators: ) , ,..., , ( 1 Pis economics and business; 2 Psmall and medium business; 3 Pinvestments and industry; 4 Pstate and municipal services; 5 Pfinance; 6 Phousing and utilities infrastructure and energy; 7 Ptransport and communication; 8 Pland resources, real estate, property; 9 Parchitecture, construction; 10 Psocial politics; 11 P -Internet, information policy, media and public relations; 12 Pculture and tourism; 13 Pphysical Culture and sport; 14 Pyouth policy; 15 Pinternational and regional relations; 16 Peducation; 17 Pconsumer market: trade and personal services; 18 Pmunicipal control; 19 Pcivil registry offices; 20 Psecurity; Ttime interval (month, quarter, year).…”

Section: Metodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…"Organization" is a procedure for internal ordering, coherence, interaction of methods and tools, a set of actions leading to the formation and improvement of interrelations of a hierarchical urban structure [16]. The procedure of "Organization" includes three stages: first, the design of activities; secondly, the construction of the structure; thirdly, the construction of the system [17].…”

Section: Fig1 Ssuses Provisioning Schemementioning

confidence: 99%

Self-Sufficient Urban Socio-Economic Space

Smirnov¹,

Semenov²,

Zakharova³

et al. 2019

Proceedings of the Internation Conference on "Humanities and Social Sciences: Novations, Problems, Prospects" (HSSNPP 2019)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article defines the self-sufficient urban socioeconomic space (SSUSES) and reveals its essence as a succession of phenomena, conditions, package of measures to achieve a certain result. The main target of SSUSES is the citizens' high life quality, achieved by: increasing incomes; improving health; raising the educational level; creating conditions conducive to the growth of people's self-respect; the formation of sufficient social, political, economic and institutional subsystems. This research identifies strategic and current benchmarks for ensuring SSUSES and defines criteria for achieving them; highlights a number of system methodology principles of the SSUSES and also defines an urban space as a multi-level structure of interacting elements combined into several level subsystems to achieve shared objectives. The implementation of a systematic approach in the SSUSES methodology is reduced to the study of urban education on the possibility of developing emergent and synergistic qualities, identifying the diverse links and mechanisms that ensure these qualities in a dynamic urban system. The system approach implementation's essence is described using the structure of SSUSES indicators, the totality of which is implemented in three stages and the corresponding strategy selection model. The process of implementing the mechanism, providing socio-economic potential increase, ensuring the possibility of urban selfdevelopment, is associated with an effective distribution of powers and responsibilities between republican and municipal authorities. Article demonstrates that the process of providing SSUSES is associated with the optimization of a multi-level structure of interacting elements combined into several-level subsystems to achieve shared objectives.

show abstract

Innovative management in Russian production companies

Cited by 8 publications

References 10 publications

Analysis of the Level of Social Development in Russia

Analysis of the Level of Social Development in Russia

Analysis of the Living Standards in the Russian Regions

Self-Sufficient Urban Socio-Economic Space

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About