“…It also occurs as a result of capacity limitations on the part of the addressee, as a result of ambiguity of rules, or involuntary and inadvertently for a number of other reasons. 11 Non-compliant behaviour therefore does not always need to be 'cured', remedied or followed by administrative enforcement or sanctions, but may be secured by remedial forms of administrative action (information, administrative assistance, legislative simplification, etc.) 12 According to both perspectives though, compliance is largely dependent on administrative action.…”
Section: Understanding Compliance: Rational and Constructivist Complimentioning
What can public authorities do in order to promote regulatory compliance? This paper argues that understanding the compliance motives is key to any enforcement strategy. Simply stepping up the enforcement effort or stiffening penalties is -most of the time -quite ineffective. Especially attempts at engineering criminal law rules to achieve a heightened deterrence effects will generally be ineffective, social science research suggests. And -much in the same vein -raising administrative enforcement efforts does not automatically raise compliance rates proportionally. There is not a one-on-one relation between enforcement effort and compliance outcome, although this idea seems to be underpinning a lot of present-day enforcement strategies. Enforcement efforts are but one of the many norm-support cues to comply. Recent research rather suggests that a sort of bandwagon-effect exists as regards regulatory compliance. Compliant behaviour, or enforcement activities that reminds us of (or merely point out) the existence of a norm, prompt
“…It also occurs as a result of capacity limitations on the part of the addressee, as a result of ambiguity of rules, or involuntary and inadvertently for a number of other reasons. 11 Non-compliant behaviour therefore does not always need to be 'cured', remedied or followed by administrative enforcement or sanctions, but may be secured by remedial forms of administrative action (information, administrative assistance, legislative simplification, etc.) 12 According to both perspectives though, compliance is largely dependent on administrative action.…”
Section: Understanding Compliance: Rational and Constructivist Complimentioning
What can public authorities do in order to promote regulatory compliance? This paper argues that understanding the compliance motives is key to any enforcement strategy. Simply stepping up the enforcement effort or stiffening penalties is -most of the time -quite ineffective. Especially attempts at engineering criminal law rules to achieve a heightened deterrence effects will generally be ineffective, social science research suggests. And -much in the same vein -raising administrative enforcement efforts does not automatically raise compliance rates proportionally. There is not a one-on-one relation between enforcement effort and compliance outcome, although this idea seems to be underpinning a lot of present-day enforcement strategies. Enforcement efforts are but one of the many norm-support cues to comply. Recent research rather suggests that a sort of bandwagon-effect exists as regards regulatory compliance. Compliant behaviour, or enforcement activities that reminds us of (or merely point out) the existence of a norm, prompt
“…This work provides strong and scientifically robust evidence that (and to what extent) innovative, rigorous, prospective, and theory-driven research outcomes-for example, generations of skinsuits, klapskates but also skating rink design and required modifications of skating technique, training methods, nutritional programs, and increased professionalism-affected world-class performance within its narrow margins of stress tolerance and adaptive potential. 6 Although the definitive limits of human performance and the limits of physical integrity under competition and training stress are widely unknown, systematic sport performance research has already demonstrated significant transfer potential. Sports science research has laid the foundation and promoted not only interventions in top-performance sport but also for other areas of a physically active life.…”
Section: Sport Performance Research: Sexy Underfunded and With Undementioning
“…The main consequence of organizational intelligence is related to organizational innovation. Organizational innovation represents the successful implementation of new ideas in the organization (Amabile et al, 1996;Versluis, 2005). It is composed of activities generating the new idea and transforming it to a new product/service or process having commercial and/or social value (Johannessen et al, 2001;Rose-Anderssen et al, 2005).…”
Section: Consequences Of Organizational Intelligencementioning
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify; margin: 0in 0.6in 0pt 0.5in;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">This article seeks to conceptualize the construct of organizational intelligence with its antecedents and consequences and offer an overall view of organizational intelligence. It also makes a conceptual contribution to form the missing link between individual intelligence research and organizational intelligence studies. Based on a comprehensive literature review, a number of propositions are developed concerning the relationships of organizational intelligence with its antecedents and consequences. Then, a model is presented depicting the relationships proposed, and implications for future research and managerial practice are discussed. Suggested implications include a more significant managerial emphasis on improving organizational intelligence as well as increased attention to social and cultural aspects regarding the development of employees and organization, besides utilizing advanced information technologies.</span></span></p>
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.