2008
DOI: 10.1080/14719030701763161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovations in governance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
206
0
22

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 313 publications
(256 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
206
0
22
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the public sector generates a sizable proportion of economic output and substantially more than the share of manufacturing in most countries (Arundel & Huber, 2013). Innovation in the public sector is of high policy interest as it has the potential to improve the efficiency and quality of government services (Moore & Hartley, 2008). Innovation in a public sector context is defined as the search for creative or novel resolutions to problems and demands, including new services, new organisational structures and improved process (Currie et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the public sector generates a sizable proportion of economic output and substantially more than the share of manufacturing in most countries (Arundel & Huber, 2013). Innovation in the public sector is of high policy interest as it has the potential to improve the efficiency and quality of government services (Moore & Hartley, 2008). Innovation in a public sector context is defined as the search for creative or novel resolutions to problems and demands, including new services, new organisational structures and improved process (Currie et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 2000s, literature dealing with publicsector innovation tried to move away both from private-sector Schumpeterian approaches emphasizing novelty in action and from organizational-level changes towards innovation genuinely attributable to the public sector and towards discussing innovations in public services and governance (See, e.g., Hartley 2005; Moore and Hartley 2008;also Pollitt 2011). However, while there is a distinct attempt to discuss public-sector phenomena (i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second is the analytical understanding of how geo-information is co-produced by alliances of mapping agencies and spatially cognitive lay volunteers. It would consider this in the context of voluntarism as part of broader public governance innovations, underpinning the co-production of social services by state and non-state actors [24]. The third is the analysis of different forms that the governance of 'co-production' can take, in comparative, empirical, studies around the world.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%