Innovation of village governance based on technology 4.0: Case study in the new otonom district

Abstract

The problem in this study is that the use of technology has not been optimal in developing village potentials associated with opportunities for village innovation programs. The problem arises because not all villages have the same capacity in aspects of the potential and capacity of village officials, so that in response to this policy the village innovation program is an alternative solution to the problem of inequality in capacity, resources, and so on. This study uses a dynamic model of village development and innovation to analyze technology-based village innovation governance in new autonomous regions. The method used is a qualitative method which relies on secondary data with descriptive data analysis techniques. The results show that the factors in the dynamic model of rural development and innovation are based on internal and external factors. Internal factors include human resources and knowledge, information and communication, community participation, leadership, local wisdom, local potential, experience, challenges and obstacles. External factors include legal umbrella, networking and cooperation, government support, as well as appreciation and incentives.

Policy Reformulation Action-Cycle Framework (PRACYF): A Case Study Decentralization and Regional Autonomy Policy in North Sumatra Province

“…| 77 Decentralization and deconcentration political decisions can develop regional fiscal as a source of PAD originating from regional taxes and levies (Undang, 2022). Legislators can innovate to encourage regional potential to have added value, including the development of a tourism information system (Undang et al, 2021) and (Cahyani et al, 2021), mapping agribusiness potential information system (Maskun et al, 2021), and innovation of digital village development based on local wisdom (Heri et al, 2021). Innovation is very important because it determines the level of professionalism (Undang, 2020).…”