2007
DOI: 10.1108/14601060710745279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovation networks and capability building in the Australian high‐technology SMEs

Abstract: PurposeStudies of capability building and organisational learning through networked arrangements have been growing in recent years. In high‐technology industries, in particular, small and medium‐sized enterprises overcome problems of resource and information limitations by becoming a part of a knowledge network. This paper seeks to examine innovation networks of the Australian high‐technology small and medium enterprises (SMEs) by focusing on the linkages employed by small businesses to learn, adapt to technol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
54
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
54
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This supports other empirical studies which show that innovation output enhances firm performance because of among others, increased competitiveness, but that the innovation process also transforms the firm's internal capabilities, making it more adaptive to change (Love et al, 2009;Mohannak, 2007). This view is compatible with the dynamic capabilities perspective (Teece et al, 1997) in that "… the process of innovation … transform firms in some way that give rise to what look like generic differences between innovators and non-innovators …" (Geroski & Machin, 1993, p. 35).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This supports other empirical studies which show that innovation output enhances firm performance because of among others, increased competitiveness, but that the innovation process also transforms the firm's internal capabilities, making it more adaptive to change (Love et al, 2009;Mohannak, 2007). This view is compatible with the dynamic capabilities perspective (Teece et al, 1997) in that "… the process of innovation … transform firms in some way that give rise to what look like generic differences between innovators and non-innovators …" (Geroski & Machin, 1993, p. 35).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The establishment of networks holds several benefits for SMEs (Robinson, 1982). SMEs normally lack economies of scale in research, have less access to information, and other critical innovation resources (Mohannak, 2007). SMEs also tend to have insufficient capacity to individually manage the whole innovation process and are therefore encouraged to collaborate with other firms leading to potential pooling of resources and information (OECD, 2010b).…”
Section: Conceptual Background and Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SMEs had little access to critical innovation resources (Mohannak 2007). As remarked by Chetty and Holm (2000), networks can help firms expose themselves to new opportunities, obtain knowledge, learn from experiences and benefit from the synergistic effect of pooled resources.…”
Section: Inter-organizational Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another author, Mohannak (2007) emphasizes the idea that business networks also improve the efficiency of the firm's innovative capability. Thus, the network environment creates a perception of collaboration and mutual benefits to all network members, which is important for the increasing and improvement of firm's innovation capability.…”
Section: Innovation From the Sociological Perspective: Networkingmentioning
confidence: 99%