2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovation and the price of wind energy in the US

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In his regression analyses of the price of electricity from wind power projects built in the USA between 1999 and 2006, Berry [41] also found that turbine size was not a relevant variable for explaining price differences, noting that the cost-increasing and cost-decreasing effects of larger turbines may cancel each other out.…”
Section: Upsizing (Economies Of Unit Scale)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In his regression analyses of the price of electricity from wind power projects built in the USA between 1999 and 2006, Berry [41] also found that turbine size was not a relevant variable for explaining price differences, noting that the cost-increasing and cost-decreasing effects of larger turbines may cancel each other out.…”
Section: Upsizing (Economies Of Unit Scale)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies, therefore, cannot rule out the possibility that the lower costs of larger wind projects may largely, or partly, be a reflection of cost reductions achieved through economies of unit scale. However, in his regression analyses, Berry [41] takes into account individual turbine size and still finds lower wind energy contract prices for larger wind farms in his sample of wind farms of 20 MW or more built in the USA between 1999 and 2006. For each additional 10 MW of wind farm generating capacity, the price in 2007 was found to be lower by about $0.62 per MWh (or 1.6% of the mean price of $38.5 per MWh).…”
Section: Economies Of Project Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reliance on these two variables as an indicator of the historical cost of wind is justified, in part, because they are two of the more significant contributors to the LCOE. However, because capital cost and performance are interdependent (e.g., newer, better performing technology sometimes costs more), reliance on only one of these variables may fail to fully explain historical (or forecast future) LCOE trends (e.g., EWEA 2009, Ferioli et al 2009, Berry 2009, and Dinica 2011. This report includes data and analysis of both historical capital costs and project performance to inform our understanding of long-term cost trends and the high-level factors that influence the cost of wind energy.…”
Section: Trends In Wind Energy Capital Costs and Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between 1980 and the early 2000s, wind power installation costs fell by more than 65% in the United States and 55% in Denmark (Nielsen et al 2010). As a result of these dramatic cost reductions, wind energy, in some parts of the world, has achieved costs that are competitive with prevailing market prices without policy support (Berry 2009, IEA 2009, and IEA and OECD 2010.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore some activities are performed such as Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) and Regional GHG Initiative (RGGI) to extend the deployment of RESs [33][34][35][36].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%